>>4042143

>what irks me

dear anon, I understand exactly what you are talking about.

I see you have already consider this facet

is it more important to you that you get credit for the notable

or is it more important that the notable information gets noted?

this place will help you tame ego

it truly is a boot camp for the mind

>>4042143

>I've seen a disturbing trend of old notables being necro'd back up

yes, in some cases it is not a bad thing as many new eyes here now, and many old hands need reminding. in other cases notables from the archives are used to confuse bakers and slide the board

>>4042327

> independent research brings up old news as well.

I think it's a mixture of both

real anon digging does bring up old bones

malicious posters also dig up old bad bones on purpose

I've read all the notables, since I archive them at /comms/ I help bakers correct errors and I leave the validity up to consensus

I don't see eye-to-eye will everything the BO has done, and we have had a comp'd BV who still haunts us along with a few who helped shit the bed back at 4chan.

All in all things are working well here even amongst the great onslaught of shitposting, malicious sliding and shills

>>4042527

>worry

ya, comfy here in the US