Anonymous ID: d17b07 Feb. 16, 2018, 7:41 p.m. No.404628   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4665 >>4705

>>404592

I don't like it anon, feels like we are missing something. Q wouldn't warn us about an impending issue when he could warn the SAS and get it handled. Logically stated, it feels like we are missing something.

Anonymous ID: d17b07 Feb. 16, 2018, 7:46 p.m. No.404684   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4697

>>404665

I still don't like it and think we need to dig more into it. Getting complacent is not what we do best here on 8chan. We don't expect, we find and validate. It just feels like we're missing something based on several things. My autism radar is going off in a major way.

Anonymous ID: d17b07 Feb. 16, 2018, 7:53 p.m. No.404759   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Okay, just my autism logic going off but given the prior three days I would say the River Thames flow through Oxford (which is called ISIS by the way). The area from ocean is easily wide enough to bring something in. Though a surface water issue would be swatted quick which leads to the other clue about subs. I just don't like it and feel like there is a big thing we are overlooking.

Anonymous ID: d17b07 Feb. 16, 2018, 7:54 p.m. No.404770   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>404746

We test nukes in the ocean (have in the past) so that isn't an issue. But a nuke in proxy to a city underwater could be much easier smuggled in and the damage would still be massive.