Anonymous ID: 5741a4 Nov. 26, 2018, 7:53 p.m. No.4044228   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4366

>>4044168

been thinking about it.

 

_27-1_yes_USA94-2

_27-1_yes_USA58-A

_27-1_yes_USA04

_Conf_BECZ_y056-(3)_y

The_Castle_Runs_RED_yes

Godspeed.

Q

 

yes is commonly 1, no being 0. 27-11, or 11-27-2018, if I could think of something for the rest then Id think tomorrow may get interesting. Right now not thinking much about it.

Anonymous ID: 5741a4 Nov. 26, 2018, 8:01 p.m. No.4044314   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4350

>>4044254

hey fellow nukeanon, operations here, agree, nuclear very real, has been for over 70yrs now. Ive been literally everywhere in a nuke, have studied more atomic physics than I can possibly remember, and have seen everything myself. Anyone arguing this is either uneducated and we can help out, or a shill. simple as that.

 

only problem we have with nukes is they made it too expensive for us to have cheap power, good jobs, reliable power, and safe power(even though many think it isnt safe). On the weapons side, good god I hope to never see ONE go off in my lifetime anywhere in the world. Stocked on KI pills just incase, as slim of a chance as that gives it is better than nothing if that pig swallowwell dem gets his way of nuking red states that wont give up guns.

Anonymous ID: 5741a4 Nov. 26, 2018, 8:12 p.m. No.4044400   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4044350

I believe you. just look up bikini atoll. watch some videos, you'll see firsthand early video tests, with high enrichment and an initial neutron kickstarter, all enriched or fusionable and fissionable product will go off VERY quickly with A LOT of heat and power, depending on A/H type.

 

While I agree that we should be prying minds as open as possible to accept a lot we didnt know, atomic weapons are real, am I saying WE developed them, no, dont know if I buy that, but, real none the less.

 

Goal here is…We need to ensure cabal doesnt use em against us while we focus on taking them down.