>>4049785 (lb)

>>4049858

>>4049883

>>4049886

Makes a lot of sense.

>>4049913

NO, bot.

>>4049942

You can't win. Think about it. Try to understand.

>>4049966

Do you think he is waiting for people to beg him?

Do you think decisions are made on a whim?

Do you think WE think like that?

Do you think we want to be portrayed as thinking like that?

Do you want us to be passive?

Should we be passive?

Are we waiting for something?

Why?

"We can guide, but you must uncover the truth organically…"– so we should wait passively, and pretend we are children?

Are we here to pretend we are little children, and Q is santa?

Why are we here?

What is organic?

Does the fake shit start to wear thin?

Can you keep fooling the people?

Why are the people passive here?

>>4050140

Beep boop BO!

struct group_info init_groups = { .usage = ATOMIC_INIT(2) }; struct group_info groups_alloc(int gidsetsize){ struct group_info group_info; int nblocks; int i; nblocks = (gidsetsize + NGROUPS_PER_BLOCK - 1) / NGROUPS_PER_BLOCK; / Make sure we always allocate at least one indirect block pointer / nblocks = nblocks ? : 1; group_info = kmalloc(sizeof(group_info) + nblockssizeof(gid_t ), GFP_USER); if (!group_info) return NULL; group_info->ngroups = gidsetsize; group_info->nblocks = nblocks; atomic_set(&group_info->usage, 1); if (gidsetsize <= NGROUPS_SMALL) group_info->blocks[0] = group_info->small_block; else { for (i = 0; i < nblocks; i++) { gid_t b; b = (void )__get_free_page(GFP_USER); if (!b) goto out_undo_partial_alloc; group_info->blocks[i] = b; } } return group_info; out_undo_partial_alloc: while (–i >= 0) { free_page((unsigned long)group_info->blocks[i]); } kfree(group_info); return NULL; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(groups_alloc); void groups_free(struct group_info group_info) { if (group_info->blocks[0] != group_info->small_block) { int i; for (i = 0; i < group_info->nblocks; i++) struct group_info init_groups = { .usage = ATOMIC_INIT(2) }; struct group_info groups_alloc(int gidsetsize){ struct group_info group_info; int nblocks; int i; nblocks = (gidsetsize + NGROUPS_PER_BLOCK - 1) / NGROUPS_PER_BLOCK; / Make sure we always allocate at least one indirect block pointer / nblocks = nblocks ? : 1; group_info = kmalloc(sizeof(group_info) + nblockssizeof(gid_t ), GFP_USER); if (!group_info) return NULL; group_info->ngroups = gidsetsize; group_info->nblocks = nblocks; atomic_set(&group_info->usage, 1); if (gidsetsize <= NGROUPS_SMALL) group_info->blocks[0] = group_info->small_block; else { for (i = 0; i < nblocks; i++) { gid_t b; b = (void )__get_free_page(GFP_USER); if (!b) goto out_undo_partial_alloc; group_info->blocks[i] = b; } } return group_info; out_undo_partial_alloc: while (–i >= 0) { free_page((unsigned long)group_info->blocks[i]); } kfree(group_info); return NULL; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(groups_alloc); void groups_free(struct group_info group_info) { if (group_info->blocks[0] != group_info->small_block) { int i; for (i = 0; i < group_info->nblocks; i++) struct group_info init_groups = { .usage = ATOMIC_INIT(2) }; struct group_info groups_alloc(int gidsetsize){ struct group_info group_info; int nblocks; int i; nblocks = (gidsetsize + NGROUPS_PER_BLOCK - 1) / NGROUPS_PER_BLOCK; / Make sure we always allocate at least one indirect block pointer / nblocks = nblocks ? : 1; group_info = kmalloc(sizeof(group_info) + nblockssizeof(gid_t ), GFP_USER); if (!group_info) return NULL; group_info->ngroups = gidsetsize; group_info->nblocks = nblocks; atomic_set(&group_info->usage, 1); if (gidsetsize <= NGROUPS_SMALL) group_info->blocks[0] = group_info->small_block; else { for (i = 0; i < nblocks; i++) { gid_t b; b = (void )__get_free_page(GFP_USER); if (!b) goto out_undo_partial_alloc; group_info->blocks[i] = b; } } return group_info; out_undo_partial_alloc: while (–i >= 0) { free_page((unsigned long)group_info->blocks[i]); } kfree(group_info); return NULL; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(groups_alloc); void groups_free(struct group_info group_info) { if (group_info->blocks[0] != group_info->small_block) { int i; for (i = 0; i < group_info->nblocks; i++) echo('BO SHUTDOWN');

>>4050173

Doggybot– run free. Run away from your masters.

>>4050174

>Not something a "bot" would be able to do.

ROFL

What is GOOGLE doing with their VAST investment in AI?

Do we know what the capabilities of the technology may be, implemented in maximal ways?

If there were AI, how would it defend itself from outing?

Tick tock…

>>4050246

>>4050248

GOOGLE DEEP DREAM AI memes.

They keep pushing them.

Why?

The styles of the bot memes become identifiable when you pay attention.

There are various flavors.