Japan was firebombed
Then nuked twice
There is actually an old dude that made it out of both
He even had a grandson
all this cause Sasha rothschild didn't want to be known as a feltcher
Preach
BRAND NEW JUDAS FEHGEL PEDOVORE BLUE WAFFLES MEME FOR TEH PEDOGATE SHITFACE
THEY ARE DELLUSIONAL FROM THE COCAINE
Look at all that general disease in a skirt
Venerial
In propositional logic, modus tollens (/ˈmoʊdəs ˈtɒlɛnz/; MT; also modus tollendo tollens (Latin for "mode that denies by denying")[1] or denying the consequent)[2] is a valid argument form and a rule of inference. It is an application of the general truth that if a statement is true, then so is its contra-positive.
The inference rule modus tollens validates the inference from
P
P implies
Q
Q and the contradictory of
Q
Q to the contradictory of
P
P.
The modus tollens rule can be stated formally as:
P
→
Q
,
¬
Q
∴
¬
P
{\frac {P\to Q,\neg Q}{\therefore \neg P}}
where
P
→
Q
P\to Q stands for the statement "P implies Q".
¬
Q
\neg Q stands for "it is not the case that Q" (or in brief "not Q"). Then, whenever "
P
→
Q
P\to Q" and "
¬
Q
\neg Q" each appear by themselves as a line of a proof, then "
¬
P
\neg P" can validly be placed on a subsequent line. The history of the inference rule modus tollens goes back to antiquity.[3]
Modus tollens is closely related to modus ponens. There are two similar, but invalid, forms of argument: affirming the consequent and denying the antecedent. See also contraposition and proof by contrapositive.
The first to explicitly describe the argument form modus tollens was Theophrastus.[4]
LETS SEE WHAT KIND OF DADDY ISSUES REMAIN FROM THE SCIENTOLOGY POTTY TRAINING POLITICS OF ASSLICKER SERIAL KILLERS
VOTE AFLB
LORD OF THE FELTCHERS
PEANUT BUTTER HOMOTUS 2020