Board Owner

BO

I posted this already a few hours ago. If you have already looked into it, please disregard.

Possibly some shill injected modified content.

Original daily mail notable:

>>4034929 and >>4034944

Headline screenshot is included in the second post.

That headline says "Soros admits he ate 'good food' and rode horses as he watched Jewish property being seized during Nai occupation"

It also shows the dailymail editor of the linked news.

BUT that link doesn't say that at all.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6415189/Revealed-Hungarian-Schindler-hid-George-Soros-Gestapo-death-squads.html

No archive was made, so I can't say for sure that dailymail did not remove that content, but right now it simply isn't there.

However those lines are included on other sites.

http://bigworldtale.com/world-news/revealed-hungarian-schindler-who-hid-george-soros-from-the-nazis/

So it looks to me like some modified HTML job instead.

Probably to discredit us / make us spread that thing.

BO, please check IP history of that poster, if possible.

>>4052299

Yeah, biggest BS is:

>[Soros] has always denied that he helped draw up the inventory.

>In an interview (not mentioning which, so that people can't easily check themselves) in 1998 he said:

>selected quotes

Incredible. Simply incredible.

It seems they use selected quotes from the 60 minutes interview, although in the 60 minutes interview [Soros] literally says that he not only collaborated with Nazis, but also has no problem with it in retrospect because if "he didn't do it, someone else would have done it."

60 minutes interview really shows what kind of a human he is. See embed.

>>4052623

But wait.

The screenshot says:

>By Jake Wallis Simons, Associate Global Editor, In Budapest, Hungary

And it's part of the screenshot of that other site.

Which means it's part daily mail, part that other site.

That author is not mentioned on the other site.

Ah wait, not I understand even more.

That other site LINKS to daily mail, to that exact article, pretending it would be that article, but it isn't.

This got even weirder.

>>4052623

cont'd >>4052681

Maybe it should be sort of mandatory for notables to be archived.

That way we could figure out what exactly happened btw.

There may be sites that can't be archived, but most can. Either via archive.is, or archive.org.

Anyway, bless you, BO.

>>4052182

>>4052623

I'm having a feeling that actually this article got changed and the "good food" lines etc. were removed.

The site says

>Published: 11:54 GMT, 26 November 2018 | >Updated: 16:11 GMT, 26 November 2018

The notable was posted around 14:00 (local time?), so that would explain it all.

If only we had an archive.

>>4052811

2 people died.

One in 1990.

Another one in 1999.

It seems it was a grave for this married couple.

>>4052896

It's not binary "yes/no".

This here was a notable.

Probably holds a bit of truth.

https://www.healthnutnews.com/japan-has-the-lowest-infant-mortality-rate-following-ban-on-mandatory-vaccinations/