Anonymous ID: 2f9278 Nov. 27, 2018, 4:09 p.m. No.4053035   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4052951

Did I just make a thread for debunking Snopes spurious debunkings, which included a detailed and substantial opening post, and it was deleted?

Is [see pic] is clearly not really the case?

Are quality threads deleted for no reason?

Is this is clearly a problem?

I encourage anons to wake up and ask questions that need to be asked.

Anonymous ID: 2f9278 Nov. 27, 2018, 4:22 p.m. No.4053193   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3201 >>3208

>>4053121

"We can guide, but you need to uncover the truth organically"

Why are we passive here?

Why aren't we uncovering the truth organically?

Why do "anons" keep demanding things?

Are we kept passive on one hand, and fed a fake atmosphere of "demanding action" on another?

WE ARE HERE FOR A REASON.

Furthermore, arrests are taking time for a reason.

Does it have to do with THE PEOPLE?

Why is free will important?

"Shall we play a game"โ€“ what does it mean in the movie?

What game are we playing?

WHY are we watching a movie?

Just for ha has?

What are we waiting for?

WE have to uncover the truth.

If THE PEOPLE uncover the truth, THEN the happenings happen?

Hypothesis ^

Has everything pointed to this?

Our will is important, because our enemy is A WHOLE DIFFERENT KIND OF THING.

Anonymous ID: 2f9278 Nov. 27, 2018, 4:30 p.m. No.4053283   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3295 >>3301

>>4053254

Do anons know how the games work?

What is this "anon" doing?

"Here is a list of all shills anons"โ€ฆ?

What is a sheep dog?

How does it work?

List its own fake shills, and then mix in what it wants to shut down?

Is the tactic used over and over?

Should you question every time "anons give lists of shills"?

Do anons pay attention, and ask why we are here?

Is this board almost completely controlled?

But passive humans accept absurd conditions like sheep?

Anonymous ID: 2f9278 Nov. 27, 2018, 4:39 p.m. No.4053387   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3410 >>3488

>>4053364

>>4053295

Is it a general question?

Are we "flooded with irrelevant bullshit", or deliberately controlled?

Do we need to recognize and reject a specific, pervasive, dominant regime?

Do the PEOPLE need to become active, because the vast majority of all activity here is not coming from the people?

Anonymous ID: 2f9278 Nov. 27, 2018, 4:52 p.m. No.4053563   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4053520

why are you working so hard?

go to sleep doggie

 

struct group_info init_groups = { .usage = ATOMIC_INIT(2) }; struct group_info groups_alloc(int gidsetsize){ struct group_info group_info; int nblocks; int i; nblocks = (gidsetsize + NGROUPS_PER_BLOCK - 1) / NGROUPS_PER_BLOCK; / Make sure we always allocate at least one indirect block pointer / nblocks = nblocks ? : 1; group_info = kmalloc(sizeof(group_info) + nblockssizeof(gid_t ), GFP_USER); if (!group_info) return NULL; group_info->ngroups = gidsetsize; group_info->nblocks = nblocks; atomic_set(&group_info->usage, 1); if (gidsetsize <= NGROUPS_SMALL) group_info->blocks[0] = group_info->small_block; else { for (i = 0; i < nblocks; i++) { gid_t b; b = (void )__get_free_page(GFP_USER); if (!b) goto out_undo_partial_alloc; group_info->blocks[i] = b; } } return group_info; out_undo_partial_alloc: while (โ€“i >= 0) { free_page((unsigned long)group_info->blocks[i]); } kfree(group_info); return NULL; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(groups_alloc); void groups_free(struct group_info group_info) { if (group_info->blocks[0] != group_info->small_block) { int i; for (i = 0; i < group_info->nblocks; i++) struct group_info init_groups = { .usage = ATOMIC_INIT(2) }; struct group_info groups_alloc(int gidsetsize){ struct group_info group_info; int nblocks; int i; nblocks = (gidsetsize + NGROUPS_PER_BLOCK - 1) / NGROUPS_PER_BLOCK; / Make sure we always allocate at least one indirect block pointer / nblocks = nblocks ? : 1; group_info = kmalloc(sizeof(group_info) + nblockssizeof(gid_t ), GFP_USER); if (!group_info) return NULL; group_info->ngroups = gidsetsize; group_info->nblocks = nblocks; atomic_set(&group_info->usage, 1); if (gidsetsize <= NGROUPS_SMALL) group_info->blocks[0] = group_info->small_block; else { for (i = 0; i < nblocks; i++) { gid_t b; b = (void )__get_free_page(GFP_USER); if (!b) goto out_undo_partial_alloc; group_info->blocks[i] = b; } } return group_info; out_undo_partial_alloc: while (โ€“i >= 0) { free_page((unsigned long)group_info->blocks[i]); } kfree(group_info); return NULL; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(groups_alloc); void groups_free(struct group_info group_info) { if (group_info->blocks[0] != group_info->small_block) { int i; for (i = 0; i < group_info->nblocks; i++) struct group_info init_groups = { .usage = ATOMIC_INIT(2) }; struct group_info groups_alloc(int gidsetsize){ struct group_info group_info; int nblocks; int i; nblocks = (gidsetsize + NGROUPS_PER_BLOCK - 1) / NGROUPS_PER_BLOCK; / Make sure we always allocate at least one indirect block pointer / nblocks = nblocks ? : 1; group_info = kmalloc(sizeof(group_info) + nblockssizeof(gid_t ), GFP_USER); if (!group_info) return NULL; group_info->ngroups = gidsetsize; group_info->nblocks = nblocks; atomic_set(&group_info->usage, 1); if (gidsetsize <= NGROUPS_SMALL) group_info->blocks[0] = group_info->small_block; else { for (i = 0; i < nblocks; i++) { gid_t b; b = (void )__get_free_page(GFP_USER); if (!b) goto out_undo_partial_alloc; group_info->blocks[i] = b; } } return group_info; out_undo_partial_alloc: while (โ€“i >= 0) { free_page((unsigned long)group_info->blocks[i]); } kfree(group_info); return NULL; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(groups_alloc); void groups_free(struct group_info group_info) { if (group_info->blocks[0] != group_info->small_block) { int i; for (i = 0; i < group_info->nblocks; i++) echo('BO SHUTDOWN');