>>4051709 (pb)
Hmm, nice "Red Cross" you've got there on that Q clock!
Yes, I have back some years ago. But here is the deal. Let's assume that Jesus did have children. I think it's entirely possible that he did. I once did the math on that. If he had 2 surviving children, and at the age of 33, that would have been a very conservative estimate for a Jewish person in that time frame. And if every 25 years the next generation started to breed. Again, that's pretty conservative for that time period. And each surviviing descendant had 2 surviving children. By the time you got down to today, he'd have billions of descendants. There would be more people on the earth today that would be his descendants, than their would be those that wouldn't be. The power of exponential growth!
So, if he has any, he probably has tons. So don't fall for the special one descendant of Jesus theory. They'd like you to believe that, I'm sure.