53-47 and Q called it a month ago…. which means it was rigged… and that isnt ok, even if in our favor

>>4055709

>It just means Q's use of the NSA's predictive analytics yielded an accurate forecast.

>Fag.

So Q knew a Dem would win AZ by 1.7%? And he knew Tester would win MT? and he knew Cruz would win Tx by 1.5%? and Scott would win FL by 0.2%? GTFO idiot

>>4055712

>Do you not understand yet?!

Soooooooo partially rigged. Got it. Fag.

>>4055744

Most intelligent answer I've heard yes. Makes total sense. The White Hats prevented the rigging just enough to win Senate… sort of like 2016 election… prevented just enough rigging for Trump to squeeze wins, but allowed most of the rigging to which we have the proof and will get them

>>4055775

Dumbass if Q knew the results a month ago, it was rigged

>>4055774

Holy shit is that real?! This man makes me laugh my ass off

>>4055826

>IT WAS THE KAV PREDICTION FFS

>If you anons want to PRETEND it was for mid-terms, go for it.

Haha I agree. Q be like "ooops, uh uh uh it was for the midterms, yeah yea"

How long does Jon Kyl hold NoName's seat for? Run-off in Jan 2019?

>>4055920

Dont worry, I wasnt expecting an intelligent answer to my intelligent post