Anonymous ID: 2b32c5 Nov. 27, 2018, 8:09 p.m. No.4056236   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6354 >>6382

>>4056063

>beanz was shunned here for being a fame fag

wrong.

 

She was shunned here for coming on drunk, talking massive shit and basically just being a dumb ass.

 

The famefagging reason got attached later.

Anonymous ID: 2b32c5 Nov. 27, 2018, 8:14 p.m. No.4056315   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6321

At this point, if you're on here, you either believe or you don't.

 

if your'e still looking for proof, go back to twitter because you'll never get the level of proof you seem to think you need - and you're probably one of the morons that's cobbling together Q proofs that look more like dental floss and push pins connecting magazine clippings.

Anonymous ID: 2b32c5 Nov. 27, 2018, 8:19 p.m. No.4056393   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6399

>>4056341

agreed (op of this discussion thread).

 

Just the first time I've seen him out in the open on Q.

 

This should be celebrated - every major personality we win over is a 'massive' victory for us.

Anonymous ID: 2b32c5 Nov. 27, 2018, 8:22 p.m. No.4056434   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6447

>>4056399

 

Look man, I already filtered you - not sure what your obsession with me is (no didn't read, and no you don't rate the TLDR girl)

 

Your worship is noted, but I'm straight. Go find knot hole.

Anonymous ID: 2b32c5 Nov. 27, 2018, 8:28 p.m. No.4056504   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6529

>>4056382

kinda what I meant by talking shit.

 

Basic point was she wasn't rejected subsequently reviled here for famefagging. That's a moniker that got added to her around the Jerome Corsi fuckery time frame… months later.

Anonymous ID: 2b32c5 Nov. 27, 2018, 8:31 p.m. No.4056553   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6571

>>4056529

I fail to see where we disagree…

 

She 'is' a fame whore, but that's not what got her rejected here…

 

And she 'is' a fake Q flipperfaggot as well.

 

Did I miss something or are you looking for an argument where one doesn't organically exist?

Anonymous ID: 2b32c5 Nov. 27, 2018, 8:34 p.m. No.4056577   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4056562

 

>No you are wrong. It was always read as Kav vote and was p

fuck off with that. I personally was one of those making the alternate decode - and I was FAR from alone.

 

Cya shill

Anonymous ID: 2b32c5 Nov. 27, 2018, 8:35 p.m. No.4056595   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4056571

yeah - and?

 

I 'still' fail to see where we disagree… I gotta assume you're actually deliberately sliding at this point.

 

May be legit, but I can't take that chance. Stupid 'argument'-no-argument thus, filtering. see ya next bread.