Anonymous ID: 04a8d3 Nov. 28, 2018, 4:21 a.m. No.4058743   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>4058719

 

Hilldawg and the DNC had a "super computer" they called ADA…

(named for Ada Lovelace)

don't hear much about the Hilldawg machine now but satanists spent 200 m on it.

Did they get ripped off?

Where is ADA now?

Anonymous ID: 04a8d3 Nov. 28, 2018, 4:35 a.m. No.4058803   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>4058778

On November 1, AFP joined news outlets around the world in covering the release of a major academic paper warning that our oceans were warming dramatically quicker than previously thought.

 

The study was undertaken by some of the world's most pre-eminent climate scientists, using state-of-the-art modelling systems reviewed by their peers, and appeared in one of the most prestigious academic journals.

 

There was just one problem: it was wrong.

 

Published in Nature, the paper by researchers from the University of California San Diego and Princeton found that ocean temperatures had warmed 60 percent more than current estimates.

 

They concluded, with no small sense of alarm, that even the most ambitious emissions cuts laid out in the global plan to prevent climate disaster would need to be slashed again by another 25 percent.

 

Soon after publication, an independent climate scientist—one who has repeatedly voiced scepticism of the consensus that human behaviour is causing global warming—spotted an error in the Nature paper's maths.

 

"After correction, the… results do not suggest a larger increase in ocean heat content than previously thought," Nicolas Lewis wrote on his Climate Science blog.

 

"Just a few hours of analysis and calculations was sufficient to uncover apparently serious (but surely inadvertent) errors in the underlying calculations.

 

"It is very important that the media outlets that unquestioningly trumpeted the paper's findings now correct the record too. But perhaps that is too much to hope for," he added.

 

https://phys.org/news/2018-11-climate-scientists-wrong.html#jCp

Anonymous ID: 04a8d3 Nov. 28, 2018, 4:53 a.m. No.4058883   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>8974

>>4058791

How about the 4 year siege of Sarajevo?

 

That was the first use of MSM to engage the entire world in a massive fraudulent "humanitarian relief" program that ended in a child hunt.

UK NGOs rescues the most "the orphans" but record keeping was intentionally poor, many orphans got lost in the system.

Anonymous ID: 04a8d3 Nov. 28, 2018, 5:27 a.m. No.4059056   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9071

>>4059034

Anon did, sort of.

So have some others.

but "behind the scenes"

ie songwriters, artist etc.

we create but are not created (by the cult)

So they rip us off.

Make a billion dollars for them?

they give you 150 k. If you keep mouth shut.

Someone has to do the work.

But front man/ Springstein BIG

naw.

That's all satan

Anonymous ID: 04a8d3 Nov. 28, 2018, 5:39 a.m. No.4059104   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9112

Or none of them are Jews because they all worship satan.

Quite a head scratcher.

>>4059078

Anon was raised as an Anglican or episcopal and they appear to be mostly gay athiests

 

so not sure thos old label apply.

 

Is someone born X, raided Y and converted to Z who rapes and murders children an X, a Y or a Z?

Or are those label categories simply employed by satanic cultists to weaponize the lizard brain against what is human within us?

 

Suggest this because we know it has been true historically.