Anonymous ID: 28515b Nov. 28, 2018, 5:11 a.m. No.4058990   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9010

>>4058347

Yikes!! No good for two major reasons. Amazon doesn’t need its tentacles in everything and also, trusting medical records to a nonhuman is really dangerous. So many errors are made/nuances that need to be looked at, edited and cleaned up by a human. I don’t care how smart a computer is, there are some things they just can’t do. I don’t think they can ever reach the level of human intelligence to take our place.

Anonymous ID: 28515b Nov. 28, 2018, 5:15 a.m. No.4059008   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>4058924

I agree there are tangents but you never know what info might be helpful to a person. We each can bring our experiences to the table and let people sift through and glean what they want and discard the “junk”.

Anonymous ID: 28515b Nov. 28, 2018, 5:21 a.m. No.4059028   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>4059019

Also correct. Some are EMR but kept locally. Others still use paper, the smaller towns with the old-times doctors. The push is always that it will speed things up. I believe some clinics were hit with a threat of penalty if they didn’t comply and switch to EMR but I don’t know if they were expected to use a cloud or not. I have a limited point of view to these things.