>>405967

But let's follow it logically

1. Did Obama Admin sell off any Strategic Assets during his Administration? If yes what?

2. Uranium

3. Oil Drilling Rights to Gazprom

4. Water Rights to France

Are those matters important? Yep

Is Shell mentioned in stringer? Yep

>>406032

Data is also a Strategic Asset

http:// www.pewtrusts.org/en/projects/data-as-a-strategic-asset

>>406101

Without the proper access to trace elements

smart bombs no worky

>>406136

What does Soros transliterate in Hebrew

Remember Soros is a made up name he chose

>>406144

Where you see that at?

But a false flag in Damasuc like that

Might necessarily draw into war many nations

! Call the preacher! Tell him you got Sunday sermon ready!

>>406300

>Peter Munk - owns the very island where Soros has his home on. P

>>406347

P= Peter Munk

>>406376

• ++ +++ Was said to be the CFR by Q himself back in early January

This was in response to so many asking why + ++ +++ were not in prison despite being suggested by Q they were.

>>406364 AND- owns most all the Gold mines turns out.

There are other names Equal To Munk

There are some Anons who know those names but have yet to share them.

They are the mega players above those we think we know are the top dogs.

If Anon is out there….who are these who are equal to Munk (who was said told Rothschild where to sit)

>>406496

>>406495

>>406515 Don't do it!

>>406536

I was there and I watched him drop that crumb

Also there when they changed that up to mean CFR / Trilateral Commission back in early January after the long break….

Yeah…I know. It just is what it is. Maybe we should move on.

>>406589 Anons didn't come up with P - That came from Q directly or (Q team)

Now if you wish to continue researching until you are able to find your own confirmation bias You can, it's all good. It all works somehow or another. That's really how this whole engine of nonsense keeps going and ends up doing some good along the way.

>>406376

Yep there ya go it's whatever you want it to mean. It's all good.

But for Wisdom's sake, it's a subject that we should drop and maybe not bring back up.

For arguing it's points, may be the ruin of many hearers.

>>405968

You can go ahead and back the Mueller /ourguy shit into the bake if you want to risk another division again. Pretty sure we've had enough of that already.

>>406740

That's exactly how I read that.

But having been here since back in 4chn…I'm going to say there little chance that peeps will stop trying to read more into it. As they always do. 90 percent of the common sense solves get lost amid a frenzy of far out shit.