>>4061215

Shill = someone paid to post

Inorganic shill = bots

What is going on [here]?

What is organic [here]?

Are humans contributing the majority of posts?

How do we know?

IF we know that humans are NOT contributing the majority of posts, THEN we know what the bot system wants to PUSH on us.

Are people paying attention?

IF you know that an AI system is PUSHING narratives at you, THEN you know what the agenda is, or can begin to deduce it.

And IF you know that posts here are NOT organic, then you know that anything that gets CHATTERED about, is a hint, and a deception.

Lots of chatter about "shills". Lots of naive chatter.

ZERO chatter about AI shills…

Once you understand how little is organic here, you can see the whole false narrative.

It is served on a silver platter.

>>4061258

What is organic here?

What images are organic?

Does the system of FAKENESS often undermine us SUBTLY?

What are some ways?

Images that, on the surface, are "ours", and, perhaps hidden in superficial irony, DETRACT from us, or portray incapacity, limitation, or other negative qualities?

IF you know that the majority of posts here are NOT organic, then THE WHOLE GAME starts to become apparent.

Why are we [HERE]?

Are the people in control here?

How do we know?

>>4061312

What is organic [HERE]?

How many of the posts that are nothing but EXPRESSIONS OF ANGER organic?

What are the MSM narratives about POTUS, and us…?

"They are angry…"

And so, "anons" here, day after day, post after post are ORGANICALLY doing their best to FULFILL MSM NARRATIVES?

Is that organic?

How much is real here?

Is it very very little?

Are we sitting on a board on which the VAST majority of posts are inorganic, and have the effect of IMPOSING an image, an atmosphere, and a strict regime of control on us?

Which then directly FEEDS the MSM narratives?

The WHY are we [HERE], in such conditions?

"We are here for a reason"– but what is it?

Why don't we answer the question?

What are we waiting for?

Are the HUMANS fighting [HERE]?

What are we waiting for?

>>4061389

Is the biden meme crappy?

Did biden get away with OPENLY fondling little girls?

Did the MSM INTENTIONALLY soft-pedal biden's activities?

Did the MSM intentionally PREEMPTIVELY cover up biden's activities?

Does the truth still sit partially in the open, but unacknowledged by a delusional public?

What are we here for?

What makes "anons" mad about biden memes?

What gets attacked here?

Once you understand that the vast majority of posts are NOT made by PEOPLE, then the whole game becomes clear.

Will people here wake up and FIGHT?

Or continue sheeping forever, waiting to be spoonfed?

FIGHT PEOPLE

>>4061448

Are anons here:

1. pushing passivity

and

1. pushing an image of disappointed expectation?

How many posts are like this, while also pretending to "be anons"?

How much is FAKE [here]?

Why are we [HERE]?

FIGHT!