>>4060676 (lb)
>overplays hand
"There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown."
The word angel does not appear in that verse, and you sure do have problems with what the word "implication" means, don't you?
Gaslighting when the ad-hominems don't work... doesn't work.
Shit if you did that to the word Trump, you'd be dead in an hour.
If you did it to the phrase "who is Q".. you would never drink again.
It's been known since the beginning that the shills are here on purpose.
Welcome to /qresearch/.
Please read one year of breads before posting again. Thanks.
"Jesus" is the cornerstone. not the layer of it. The Creator ("GOD") created the cornerstone.
"Jesus" comes here in many forms, and has over the millennia.
Even "the second coming of Christ" is possible under that scenario, if one treats the Christ as a persona (read: archetype), instead of as a person.
Good day.
Debates over archetypes are fun, but they get boring fast. More accurate information is in the Sumerian texts.
>if that's what you needed
meh, sarcasm is lost on the internet unless it's blunt I guess.. I'll smoke a …cigar on that day.. I'm not much of a drinker when I celebrate kekek
>>>4061309 I agree with this post → >>4061323
>1) Shut it down
>2) Round them up
>3) Build the Wall
>4) Win 2020
Because if Trump is threatening that, then that means he's operating from a position of strength.
Because he seems to have a record for roll under the idea that even if you're bluffing… It isn't really ever a bluff ;)