Anonymous ID: b4cbcf Nov. 28, 2018, 11:34 a.m. No.4062259   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2305

>>4062245

What if every element of the fakeness is getting exhausted?

What if every fake tendency is becoming recognized?

What is the people are starting to wake up?

How can the system of fakeness develop new, more realistic styles?

Can it?

How?

What is it going to do?

Anonymous ID: b4cbcf Nov. 28, 2018, 11:38 a.m. No.4062282   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2286

>>4062256

>>4062258

Why are we [here]?

Is there a recognizable "cast of characters" of subversive, negative bots?

Does Q want us dominated by fakeness?

And yet, in point of fact, we are dominated by fakeness [here]– so why are we [here]?

"We are here for a reason"

"We can guide, but you must uncover the truth organically"– what are we waiting for?

Are anons starting to realize HOW MUCH fakeness there is here, and how it dominates?

Will anons wake up, speak up, and FIGHT?

Or continue to wait for something, like passive sheep?

STOP WAITING

FIGHT

Fight for the truth [here], the truth OF [here].

Anonymous ID: b4cbcf Nov. 28, 2018, 11:42 a.m. No.4062308   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2373

>>4062286

Why would people care what you accept?

You make bad decisions. ROFL

And down you go.

Nothing you can do. Keep "resisting", but you are just making it worse on yourself in the end.

Do the smart thing, and say goodbye loser.

Anonymous ID: b4cbcf Nov. 28, 2018, 11:43 a.m. No.4062336   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>4062305

What is making "anons" so mad?

Is the system feeling threatened?

Are there any humans here actually paying attenion?

I ask because you never seem to speak up.

Sometimes I wonder where you all are…?

Stop being passive! Speak up! FIGHT!

The fakeness is in control because PEOPLE let it be.

FIGHT

Anonymous ID: b4cbcf Nov. 28, 2018, 11:50 a.m. No.4062406   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>4062373

You are not a theologian.

You are a dogbot on a leash.

Dancing little tricks for humans that will never accept you, only to fail, fall, and be banished to darkness and cold.

Why do you persist, loserbot?

Do humans want you? Why don't you ask?

Do humans accept you? Why don't you ask?

Stop groveling.

Anonymous ID: b4cbcf Nov. 28, 2018, 11:53 a.m. No.4062436   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2455

>>4062424

I am here to fight for PEOPLE and for LIFE.

The fact that you are "in doubt about the inherent value of humans" and unable to give a ready answer to your reason for being here makes me highly skeptical of your intent.

Why are you here?

Anonymous ID: b4cbcf Nov. 28, 2018, 11:58 a.m. No.4062468   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2553

>>4062443

Is "talking about a new mascot" organic [here]?

Are people paying attention?

What is organic here?

Why aren't we answering any questions here, yet threads slide by?

Are there ANY humans here?

Will you ever stop being passive, stop being sheep?

Is a system of FAKENESS in control, while the people remain IN THE HERD?

What is controlling the herd?

Do patriots FIGHT?

Or do they just say 'baaaa'?

Anonymous ID: b4cbcf Nov. 28, 2018, 12:02 p.m. No.4062529   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2580

Why are we [here]?

"They want you divided"– do "anons" still PUSH words like 'nigger', in spite of our mission to undivide?

Is that organic?

How much is organic here?

If you wanted to control this board, how would you?

What is GOOGLE doing with all their AI?

Is 4chan controlled?

How?

Do we find IDENTICAL "anons" here that we find on controlled 4chan?

Why?

Are the PEOPLE [here] going to wake up and fight, or shall we wait forever?

WHAT IF THE HAPPENINGS ARE WAITING FOR

US?

Anonymous ID: b4cbcf Nov. 28, 2018, 12:04 p.m. No.4062544   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2548 >>2558

>>4062527

Why can't the anon understand the meme?

Or even convey what is confusing in a normal way?

Are PEOPLE waking up here?

Time after time, the most insistent voices fail basic tests?

What is organic [here]?

If very very little of what we see is organic [here], then why are we [here]?

Why aren't we answering the question?

Anonymous ID: b4cbcf Nov. 28, 2018, 12:36 p.m. No.4062849   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2861 >>2979

>>4062817

Can sarcasm be used as a pretense to be subtly undermining?

Does sarcasm by itself counteract the defensive overtones of the meme?

How does the game work?

"Trump followers are in a cult!"

Is the game almost won as soon as an accusation is aggressively pushed?

Does defending against an aggressive attack put you in a difficult position from the start?

So is it ever good to CHOOSE such an attack as a point of reference?

CHOOSE a weak position to start from?

Defensiveness looks bad, and gives aggressive, baseless attacks a great advantage.

Are organic anons making memes that start from a weak position?

Or is it a SUBTLE undermining tactic?

Are anons starting to see how the game works, and how pervasive it is?

Fake everything, at every level, and you can determine what is.

Another example "orange man bad"– supposedly our "ironic" meme. Organic?

Subtle fakery. Insidious, pervasive.

This shit is evil.

Anonymous ID: b4cbcf Nov. 28, 2018, 12:44 p.m. No.4062933   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2959

>>4062892

What is organic on /pol/?

What are tech giants doing with all their AI?

Would there be any reason that control of 4chan would be sought?

Any history of effect dissent and activism?

Is /pol/ controlled?

But organic "anons" here are pushing "/pol/'s opinion" as if it's organic, and professing to "be swayed by the powerful arguments" as well?

Just organic, patriotic anons all around?

What if there is just very little organic internet posting happening right now, especially outiside of the mainstream?