Anonymous ID: 6c87c4 Nov. 28, 2018, 2 p.m. No.4063732   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3762

Hey Anon who was on here a few breads back asking about SP?

I mentioned SP was "service provider"…..

 

I think I found your confirmation - Sean Davis tweeted earlier.

The statue about "publishers vs 3rd party service providers".

Hence the context about censorship.

Sort of still ties into the Q post about SP "active users" numbers - I will maintain are falsified - even on Facebook.

 

My sauce on that is personal. Right before FB went public, i bailed out with all the tracking early 2011. Only a few years ago I noticed that several of my 'legal names' also had accounts but I was unable to access them. It appeared that they might have taken a database of some sort and created accounts to make their numbers of users look better than actual.

That an the number of 'bots' that are active in FB and TW and likely other places. Those would count to the 'active users'.

So it's all a numbers game.

I feel sorry for the investors tbh. Its all fake.

Just like the dotcom bubble. (was on the inside of that fakery too)