Stormy Daniels Accuses Michael Avenatti of Filing Trump Defamation Case Against Her Wishes and Not Accounting for Donations

Porn start actress and stripper Stormy Daniels has accused her attorney Michael Avenatti of filing a defamation suit against President Donald Trump against her wishes. Trump won that case in October and was awarded attorney fees, leaving Daniels on the hook for a reported $350,000.

Daniels also accused Avenatti of ignoring her requests for an accounting of donations raised for her defense and opening a second fundraising account in her name without her permission.

Daniels made the accusation in a statement to the Daily Beast on Wednesday.

“For months I’ve asked Michael Avenatti to give me accounting information about the fund my supporters so generously donated to for my safety and legal defense. He has repeatedly ignored those requests. Days ago I demanded again, repeatedly, that he tell me how the money was being spent and how much was left. Instead of answering me, without my permission or even my knowledge Michael launched another crowdfunding campaign to raise money on my behalf. I learned about it on Twitter.

…”Michael has not treated me with the respect and deference an attorney should show to a client. He has spoken on my behalf without my approval. He filed a defamation case against Donald Trump against my wishes. He repeatedly refused to tell me how my legal defense fund was being spent. Now he has launched a new crowdfunding campaign using my face and name without my permission and attributing words to me that I never wrote or said”…

End excerpt. Please read the complete Stormy Daniels statement at the Daily Beast.

Avenatti fundraising tweet Daniels spoke about:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/11/stormy-daniels-accuses-michael-avenatti-of-filing-trump-defamation-case-against-her-wishes-and-not-accounting-for-donations/

Mattis: 'No Smoking Gun' Showing Saudi Crown Prince Involved in Khashoggi Murder

The United States has not uncovered a smoking gun which proves that Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman was involved in the murder of Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi, US Secretary of Defense James Mattis said on Wednesday.

"We have no smoking gun that the Crown Prince was involved. Not the intelligence community or anyone else. We have no smoking gun," Mattis told reporters outside the Pentagon.

Mattis added that he has personally read all the intelligence on Khashoggi and all the translations of the recordings of his murder at the Saudi consulate in Turkey.

"We do not have the tapes. Least I am not aware that we do. But I have read the translation twice," he told reporters.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo also told reporters earlier on Wednesday that he has read every piece of intelligence, but has not found "direct reporting" connecting bin Salman to Khashoggi's death.

Last week, US media reported that the CIA concluded bin Salman personally ordered the killing of Khashoggi.

Khashoggi went missing on October 2 after entering the Saudi consulate in Istanbul, and the Saudi Prosecutor General's Office has since concluded that he was killed inside the consulate by lethal injection before his body was dismembered and removed from the building.

https://sputniknews.com/us/201811291070222853-khashoggi-saudi-mattis-usa-crown-prince/

Ann Coulter: Trump’s Great Wall Becomes Trump’s Great Stall

For those of us who were ecstatic the night Donald Trump was elected president, who watch election night videos over and over again, it used to be easy to defend him against the charge that he is just a BS-ing con man who would say anything to get elected.

It’s getting harder.

Trump was our last chance. But he’s spent two years not building the wall, not deporting illegals — “INCREDIBLE KIDS!” — and not ending the anchor baby scam.

Within 10 seconds of Trump’s leaving office, there will be no evidence that he was ever president. Laws will be changed, executive orders rescinded, treaties re-written and courts packed.

Trump will leave no legacy at all. Only a wall is forever.

We had no choice. No one else was promising to save America.

“On day one, we will begin working on an impenetrable, physical, tall, powerful, beautiful southern border wall. We will use the best technology, including above- and below-ground sensors, that’s the tunnels. Remember that: above and below. Towers, aerial surveillance and manpower to supplement the wall, find and dislocate tunnels and keep out criminal cartels …” –Presidential candidate Donald J. Trump

But then he signed a spending bill expressly prohibiting him from building any part of the wall.

“I will never sign another bill like this again. I’m not going to do it again.” — President Trump, after signing a spending bill that blocked any funding for a wall.

Today, eight months later, Trump is about to sign another spending bill that will give him no money for the wall.

Anyone want to bet me that he won’t?

So much for the world’s greatest negotiator.

Donald Trump is the commander in chief. He doesn’t need Congress’ approval to defend the nation’s borders.

But as long as his excuse for not building the wall is that Congress hasn’t appropriated money for it, why on earth would he sign a spending bill that doesn’t give it to him?

There is no tomorrow on this. Republicans are about to lose the House. It’s now or never.

We didn’t need someone to tell us how hard it is to get anything done in Washington. We knew that.

https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2018/11/28/ann-coulter-trumps-great-wall-becomes-trumps-great-stall/

>>4064694

I read it as an admission she's one of (((them)))

>>4064881

YOU GLOW

>>4064926

"Stormy Daniels" would be trademarked surely! Interesting, definitely needs a lawfags assessment

Video: British Special Forces in Ukraine. Alleged Chemical Weapons and Black Ops Against Donbass?

We bring to the attention of our readers a Donbass report pertaining to the presence of British Special Forces in Ukraine. Yet to be verified these special forces are said to be experts in chemical weapons.

British military personnel have been present in Ukraine since 2015 involved in training Ukraine military personnel

On November 21, 2018, a few days prior to the Kerch Strait Incident, the British Ministry of Defense confirmed that a new contingent of UK special forces were slated to be sent to Ukraine.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/video-british-special-forces-in-ukraine-alleged-chemical-weapons-and-black-ops-against-donbass/5661255

US Senate advances proposal to stop backing Saudi Arabia in Yemen

In face of State Department and Pentagon opposition, the Senate voted 63-37 to allow a floor vote on Resolution 54, a bipartisan proposal to block any further US support to the Saudi-led coalition waging war in Yemen since 2015.

If actually adopted by the Senate with a veto-proof majority, the resolution would force the Trump administration to stop logistical and other support to the Saudi coalition, and require authorization from Congress before such support is given.

Proposed by Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont), the resolution has found backers in many Senate Democrats, as well as Senators Mike Lee (R-Utah) and Rand Paul (R-Kentucky). Judging by the vote on Wednesday, several more Republicans are in favor of at least having a floor vote on the issue.

Earlier in the day, the Senate was briefed in a closed session by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Secretary of Defense James Mattis, both of whom argued that the resolution would weaken Washington’s leverage with Riyadh and urged the legislators to back down.

“I know all too well the difficulty in reconciling human aspirations with war's grim reality; but I also recognize that we cannot limit civilian casualties or advance the peace effort commencing early next month in Sweden by disengaging,” Mattis said in prepared marks provided to select media outlets.

https://www.rt.com/usa/445101-yemen-war-saudi-support-bill/

NOTE: Bernie's loving this shit, trying to withdraw the whitehats from finishing off the cabal in Yemen.

Wolf Creek actor John Jarratt committed to stand trial for alleged rape

Australian actor John Jarratt has been committed to stand trial on allegations he sexually assaulted a flat mate more than 40 years ago.

Jarratt has pleaded not guilty.

Jarratt, 66, is accused of sexually assaulting a woman at Randwick, in Sydney's eastern suburbs, in September 1976.

He is best known for his lead role in the movie Wolf Creek and its sequel, having also appeared on Australian television shows McLeod's Daughters and Play School.

https://www.9news.com.au/national/2018/11/29/11/06/wolf-creek-actor-john-jarratt-committed-to-stand-trial-for-rape

>>4065211

Those who scream the loudest