I volunteer.
Also, if I have 'd5' in my ID, doesn't that prove that KEK WILLS for me to be allowed to bake?
Let the PEOPLE bake.
"spammer"– meaningless
I am a patriot. I should not be prevented from baking.
Humans [here], are any of you paying attention?
Are the people in control [here]?
The answer is in your face, every day, and yet the people remain, passive, silent, ACCEPTING of artificial control…?
FIGHT
If you look closely at Pelosi's words and her body language in her comments yesterday, you get some clear hints about what is going on.
At 4:11, referring to the Democratic caucus, she says "our unity is our power"– for a second, right as she says this, a look of mockery flashes on her face. Moment captured here: >>4072413
This flashing look of mockery occurs again at 4:21, when talking about the results she expects for the Democrats: >>4072403
The uncomfortable and unenthused looks on her colleagues' faces, and these subtle moments of mockery suggest that the words are not quite so true as they would seem. The Democrats did not nominate her "because they are so unified". Something else is going on.
The most telling part starts at 6:35, with Nancy talking about working with POTUS. At 6:38 she hesitates, and looks, up, then grimaces and looks down, before referring to "my power"… This noticable pause and facial complication clearly indicates that there is some hidden emotion relating to her own power.
When we look at how quickly and confidently POTUS suggested Pelosi would be the speaker again after the midterms; compare Pelosi's manner and attitude to Lindsey Graham's; and keep in mind the basic idea that POTUS et. al. are using leverage to make deals and make progress in draining the swamp, then we have a very good framework for explaining Pelosi's ease of victory, her overall air of cheerfulness (freedom), her colleagues' apparent ill-ease, and her nonetheless stumbling at the memory of her own power (no longer independent), and her apparent subtle facial mockery of her colleagues.
I.e. it's happening.
Are you saying that because you are looking objectively, or because you are working to impose an atmosphere of negativity?
Are any of these responses organic?
What is organic [here]?
Is an image imposed here?
Are we KEPT locked into negativity at all times?
What gets attacked [here]?
"Body language" is attacked with a strawman "It is all that matters"– why?
If an anon posts, and 4 "anons" make [fake] negative comments, and the PEOPLE don't comment, then do we see how this board is controlled?
Why are we [here] in these conditions that undermine us in countless ways?
We ARE here for a reason, but WE must uncover the truth.
What are we waiting for?
PEOPLE– when will you FIGHT?
Are you saying that Siri FLIPPED?
Is the board locked into negativity?
How would you know?
What COULD it be?
Go through the posts and look at them, one by one.
How many fake posts demanding action (as if we CAN'T think outside of any box; as if we are just a helpless crowd of simpletons demanding OTHERS gratify us).
The Pelosi thing is very INTERESTING, and highly suggestive of CORROBORATION of everything Q says… but when elements supportive of this are pointed out, 3 anons have deflationary responses, others' comments are RESTRICTED to a blood thirsty call for "rope", rather than anything either thoughtful or positive in a non-violent way.
Do these responses thus effectively control the collective response to the Pelosi situation, as reflected in her comments?
Does the whole board consist of systematic commenting that does the same thing for EVERYTHING?
Keeping the board locked into a much more negative, much less constructive, and much more fragmented condition than it would be if ORGANIC?
Why are we [here]?