I will take the handoff. I am a person. Will I be allowed to bake?
PEOPLE, volunteer
Who/what is in control here?
How do you know unless YOU step and get involved?
FIGHT
If you look closely at Pelosi's words and her body language in her comments yesterday, you get some clear hints about what is going on.
At 4:11, referring to the Democratic caucus, she says "our unity is our power"– for a second, right as she says this, a look of mockery flashes on her face.
This flashing look of mockery occurs again at 4:21, when talking about the results she expects for the Democrats: >>4073836
The uncomfortable and unenthused looks on her colleagues' faces, and these subtle moments of mockery suggest that the words are not quite so true as they would seem. The Democrats did not nominate her "because they are so unified". Something else is going on.
The most telling part starts at 6:35, with Nancy talking about working with POTUS. At 6:38 she hesitates, and looks, up, then grimaces and looks down, before referring to "my power"… This noticable pause and facial complication clearly indicates that there is some hidden emotion relating to her own power.
When we look at how quickly and confidently POTUS suggested Pelosi would be the speaker again after the midterms; compare Pelosi's manner and attitude to Lindsey Graham's; and keep in mind the basic idea that POTUS et. al. are using leverage to make deals and make progress in draining the swamp, then we have a very good framework for explaining Pelosi's ease of victory, her overall air of cheerfulness (freedom), her colleagues' apparent ill-ease, and her nonetheless stumbling at the memory of her own power (no longer independent), and her apparent subtle facial mockery of her colleagues.
I'm not sure what this is supposed to be.
>SR-71 Blackbird
Why are you losing control of your emotions anon?
We aren't here to get mad and swear at people.
LOL
What controls the atmosphere of this board?
What makes the board seem "angry"?
Organic anons?
What are the MSM narratives
"right wing anger!"
Are we MORE or LESS angry now that we know more?
Of course, that cuts both ways…
But the FACT of constructive action leads away from
"OMG, I'm so mad!" "Fuck them! Fuck them! Fuck them!"
And instead leads us to
"Soon…"
What controls the atmosphere here?
Is it organic?
How many ways are we subtly undermined [here]?
Do anons pay attention?
Do anons question?
How many memes are there pretending to be "ours" that subtly undermine?
This inflatable baby has been pushed by an "anon" pretending it was "ours"!
Is the "NPC meme" with "orange man bad" as a slogan organic? Would that be OUR choice as a tactic– one that belittles POTUS "ironically"?
What is the game?
Look at the images that appear at the top of this board each day– do they subtly undermine us?
Do anons pay attention? Question?
-
POTUS with cowboy hat "have hat, and cattle"– what is implied (underneath the surface)?
-
Pompeo laughing "Trust Kansas" – what is implied?
-
GIF of POTUS making downward chopping motion, grinning "We will fight"– what is implied?
-
The letter Q with a blonde toupee– is this a good image for us in any way?
5 GIF from SNL with POTUS grinning in costume "Winning"– what does this imply?
Where do those images come from?
Who decides to put them there?
Do the PEOPLE have any input?
Do the PEOPLE have any power or control [here], or are they passive, sheep-like, and just accepting what is imposed?
You combine subtle undermining with overt attacks that go unchecked, unchallenged– why?
What allows an "ebot" to be a dominant presence [here]?
Do anons question this?
Do countless "anons" keep trying to PUSH "ebot" as some kind of mascot?
Why?
Is ANY of that organic?
Does the BO PROTECT "ebot"?
If so why?
Do anons pay attention, question, or FIGHT, ever?
Waiting to be spoonfed by Q?
What if Q CAN'T spoonfeed some things?
What if Q specifically MISLEADS anons in certain specific ways to force us to question Q HIMSELF?
What if this is to maximize the degree to which we exercise our FREE WILL to choose to reject tyranny?
Where is the tyranny?
Why are we [here]?
FIGHT anons.
Are you trying to pretend that "ebot" is a human "anon"?
Does "anon" after "anon" after "anon" imply this same thing, time after time, thread after thread, with similar attempts to "explain" "ebot"?
Is this an organic phenomenon?
Does "ebot" seem at all like a person– let alone a PATRIOT?
Does "ebot" OFTEN spew anti-POTUS propaganda?
Then why do "anons" here pretend it is "a lovable human mascot"?
Is it even close to believable?
Is it subtly undermining, especially since it spews anti-POTUS propaganda?
And yet the people here don't question it, don't FIGHT it, ignore it, accept it like sheep?
Will you WAKE UP people, or shall we wait forever?
It is up to US to uncover the truth organically.
STOP WAITING. FIGHT