>>4073796 (lb)

>Pretty sure they do have multiple meanings, early on the book digs + sequences some anon/shill made a convincing argument that GOOG results, especially books can be manipulated and pushed to the top.

That's not the only number we've seen manipulated. Didn't we observe tweets and half chan post numbers that were outside the realm of chance? How about a unique, random user ID yesterday being an anon's birthday? Spoopy. Maybe Big Brother IS watching.