Anonymous ID: 9f2ba8 Nov. 29, 2018, 10:05 a.m. No.4074635   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4659 >>4684

>>4074489 (lb)

 

Are you trying to pretend that "ebot" is a human "anon"?

Does "anon" after "anon" after "anon" imply this same thing, time after time, thread after thread, with similar attempts to "explain" "ebot"?

Is this an organic phenomenon?

Does "ebot" seem at all like a personโ€“ let alone a PATRIOT?

Does "ebot" OFTEN spew anti-POTUS propaganda?

Then why do "anons" here pretend it is "a lovable human mascot"?

Is it even close to believable?

Is it subtly undermining, especially since it spews anti-POTUS propaganda?

And yet the people here don't question it, don't FIGHT it, ignore it, accept it like sheep?

Will you WAKE UP people, or shall we wait forever?

It is up to US to uncover the truth organically.

STOP WAITING. FIGHT

Anonymous ID: 9f2ba8 Nov. 29, 2018, 10:07 a.m. No.4074648   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4674

If you look closely at Pelosi's words and her body language in her comments yesterday, you get some clear hints about what is going on.

 

At 4:11, referring to the Democratic caucus, she says "our unity is our power"โ€“ for a second, right as she says this, a look of mockery flashes on her face.

This flashing look of mockery occurs again at 4:21, when talking about the results she expects for the Democrats:

 

The uncomfortable and unenthused looks on her colleagues' faces, and these subtle moments of mockery suggest that the words are not quite so true as they would seem. The Democrats did not nominate her "because they are so unified". Something else is going on. โ†’ >>4074642

 

The most telling part starts at 6:35, with Nancy talking about working with POTUS. At 6:38 she hesitates, and looks, up, then grimaces and looks down, before referring to "my power"โ€ฆ This noticable pause and facial complication clearly indicates that there is some hidden emotion relating to her own power.

 

When we look at how quickly and confidently POTUS suggested Pelosi would be the speaker again after the midterms; compare Pelosi's manner and attitude to Lindsey Graham's; and keep in mind the basic idea that POTUS et. al. are using leverage to make deals and make progress in draining the swamp, then we have a very good framework for explaining Pelosi's ease of victory, her overall air of cheerfulness (freedom), her colleagues' apparent ill-ease, and her nonetheless stumbling at the memory of her own power (no longer independent), and her apparent subtle facial mockery of her colleagues.

 

I.e. it's happening.

Anonymous ID: 9f2ba8 Nov. 29, 2018, 10:12 a.m. No.4074698   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4074675

horrid dogshit bot

Why is it allowed to flourish?

What DEFENDS it? Do anons pay attention?

Why are we [here]?

QUESTION things anon.

"Think for yourself"โ€“ HOW do anons do that?

WHAT do you question?

Even when certain things are RIGHT IN YOUR FACE EVERY DAY, you don't question them?

Why not?

What are you waiting for?

Anonymous ID: 9f2ba8 Nov. 29, 2018, 10:41 a.m. No.4074977   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5061

>>4074621 (ob)

No, it doesn't make any sense, because the specific AI we are dealing with is 100% weaponized against us as a nightmare, and is functioning as a machinery of PURE EVIL, vaccuuming up our data, emulating all of us, manipulating us relentlessly, and imposing control on us.

All of this is brand new to you, "anon", who are blithely consuming MSM puff pieces on the tech, I take it?