I chuckled. Nice one.
I like it. Even though I'd like to see ravens pecking at a corpse. No, nooo. I didn't say that. hehe.
It doesn't hold a lot weight. There are so many people who've survived for so much longer than what the 'stats' say they will.
And TBH, people want to think along those lines as well. They hold out hope based on these lengthy survival stories.
JMO, others may think differently.
It calls for the average fag to know the difference.
What I'm getting at is that most people don't think of what type of cancer, they just think cancer. They hear a success story and don't want it to be anything other than a success that's achievable by them or their loved one.
I know I over analyze shit. Just the way I'm reading it.
You don't need to sell it to me. I'm sold. I'm trying to put myself in the average person's mind, and that's what I come up with.
YESSIREEBOB. You got it. And all should do it.
That's what I would've gone with, but there's endless choices. It could be Immobilize. It could be anything.
IMM = Immittance?
Would link with frequencyfags.
Effective
BUT… a thwarted attack; an attack that isn't carried out because we/us/Q etc made enough noise to stop it, is only heresay.
But for every attack that HAPPENS, the question will be asked as to why Q didn't stop it. By signing the meme off as Q is putting Q in a shitty light. The only way that Q can be seen as a competent source for this is if the attack occurs. And again, why didn't Q stop it?
:/ See where I'm going with this?
I go back to the why didn't Q stop it, scenario. Q doesn't need nor want to be a hero, to my understanding. (at least, I hope not). It's not about Q. It's about warning people. But if Q needs for Q to be mentioned, tagged or billboarded, there's an issue. Normies will react in different ways and Q, for the most part will not fair well if people die. People who have no knowledge of Q in this instance do not need for Q to be advertised to them in this way. And it is an advertisement.
If people die, Q's credibility dies in the hearts of all those effected, instantly, if Q is attached to the warning.
If Q knew, why didn't Q stop it? It comes down to that. Think outside of your own belief and understanding.
I see a lot of problems. I think them through. I don't always come up with answers, but I search for them.
Attaching Q to warnings that 'we' have no real inside information about, is bad PR.
Ask yourself the same question that you asked me and put yourself in the shoes of someone who lives in the world of MSM.
You can only open the box once in this timeline. If people are geared negatively toward Q because either something did or didn't happen (and we've had a lot of negativity build over the 'didn't') you might as well bring up 'R', because Q will lose credibility. Only those who fall into a trap of wanting so badly, woship etc, will continue to pay attention to Q.
I personally believe that attaching 'Q' to memes and messages should be kept within a buffer zone of sorts. Kept within sphere that only reaches out so far to those who are ready, and in no way to those who are not. To those who are not, they form the 'resistance'.
I'm not good at this. I'm really not. I just say as I see. I don't thrive on debate or whatever.
What about the thousands of others of whom survived, that never made a news article, let alone a news real?
Doctors are not gods. They guess a lot. They make a lot of mistakes and miscalculations based on data that's collated to suit drug companies etc.
Think outside the box.
NO ONE has been able to bring anything to the table that can not be disputed.
Matter of fact.
God day/night, anons.
Do good!