>>4075035 (lb)

"fast and loose" was VERY sloppy language on my part. Q's precision is a YUGE part of what has me so intrigued, perhaps because that precision can take multiple forms in the same text (layers). Conversely, I was very IMPRECISE with my choice of words. "Fast and loose" suggests "breaks the rules when convenient" or doesn't strictly adhere to the rules of the rules. While most observers don't perceive the whole of the "rules" with 20/20 clarity, I'm am persuaded to think that it's quite possible they've been thoroughly spelled out and adhered to. I shuld have used language to more precisely convey that the "left is right" and "think mirror" and "up is down" drops, combined with careful observation, almost certainly suggest that means that… oh…. say 116 could be a form of 911, and 11 can be 55… etc. All well within the comms as laid out, though. "Fast and loose" demonstrates the error of action that precedes thoughtful preparedness.

>>4075545

>>4075567

>>4075451

>>4075496

I'm all over the place on this issue. I think "future proves past" applies to Q AND Bible prophecy, in that the pieces will fit together perfectly looking back at it, but trying to use it to predict details before they happen could be a lot further off the mark than we can imagine.

(I said "mark")

What if the end times play out over a hundred or more years. What if 7 years is/was 70 years… what if the Antichrist is/was the illuminati and/or a single man associated therewith… and the "can't buy or sell" was the US Petro Dollar and/or just a general reference to (((their))) central banks. What if the temple isn't a rebuilt literal one in Jerusalem. What if a LOT of things described were described symbolically and/or not literally and/or with coinciding but not equal lengths of time… etc.

All that said… JFK head wound… interdasting.

>>4075853

I increasingly lean 1. Or some combo thereof. But yeah… I've increasingly come to think it's very much like you speculated pretty eloquently.