>>4075700 5187
Lurch "official" travel
https://2009-2017.state.gov/secretary/travel/2016/t24/index.htm
https://2009-2017.state.gov/secretary/travel/2016/t15/index.htm
>>4075700 5187
Lurch "official" travel
https://2009-2017.state.gov/secretary/travel/2016/t24/index.htm
https://2009-2017.state.gov/secretary/travel/2016/t15/index.htm
https://townhall.com/columnists/justinhaskins/2017/02/20/did-hillary-clinton-have-a-secret-meeting-with-chinese-officials-fefore-2016-election-n2288296
Unfortunately for those on the left making these assertions, evidence in WikiLeaks’ John Podesta e-mails show Hillary Clinton may also have engaged in similar actions as those committed by Flynn. In a January 2016 e-mail sent to Podesta and several high-level Clinton staffers, Kurt Campbell, the former Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs (from 2009 to 2013), told the Clinton team he had a private meeting with a Chinese ambassador who wanted to have “an informal, private, off the record get together with a few of us to discuss the next year and the current state of US-China affairs.”Clinton staffer Jake Sullivan responded by saying he had “three or four other things to discuss with you. Can we do a calltomorrow or Monday?” On the same e-mail chain, Podesta would later agree to reach out to Campbell to discuss the matter.
If Clinton did meet with the Chinese ambassador, as Campbell suggested, her meeting also violated the Logan Act, assuming such a claim could be made against Flynn. Regardless of whether the Logan Act should apply (I don’t think it should), her staff’s attempts to set up the meeting is even more troubling than anything Flynn allegedly did, because Clinton’s team attempted to put this meeting together (and may have succeeded) prior to the 2016 election. Whatever faults can be reasonably claimed against Flynn for speaking to Russian officials, it’s clear he was acting in anticipation of becoming President Trump’s national security advisor just a few short weeks later.