>>4076874 (lb)
That date / exif profile SS is a red herring. It's simply the date that particular exif profile was created / discovered. It's not in the pic's meta. Only the SS timestamp, which is today.
>>4076874 (lb)
That date / exif profile SS is a red herring. It's simply the date that particular exif profile was created / discovered. It's not in the pic's meta. Only the SS timestamp, which is today.
That's NOT the date of the photo. It's the date of the PROFILE (P3). You're going down the very wrong hole…but have fun I guess.
Fair enough. Just don't want disinformation going around it was the photo's date. Thx!
What IS interesting is the timestamp for the screenshot is in the FUTURE (assuming EST or UTC, take your pick.
What's significant about 6:18:28 PM?
No matter what time zone the meta timestamp was in the future at the time of the Q post.
Q wound the clock FORWARD before taking the SS. Why?
The file:
A8FFF8C6-6F82-4875-9C9B-0CFB73410A93.png
from Q's post is a screenshot of a photo. Done on an iPhone most likely.
The creation timestamp of that file is 11/29/2018 6:16:28 PM.
Assuming EST that was and STILL IS in the future.
That help clarify?