Anonymous ID: 19ee19 Nov. 30, 2018, 1:26 a.m. No.4083454   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3460 >>3485

>>4083412

I think you might be earnest so Wtf do you want. Baker control and thus notable list is too easy to derail so either bo bakes everything or the shitshow is tolerated as long as threads get made.

 

It's not worth fighting about. Observe the daily actual comped bakers trying to derail, successfully during the tard dayshift, and enjoy the eternal fact that it's not good enough to stop shit or even chase the people who will just call them niggers, troll the shit out of them and continue.

 

This baker seems cool. I fucking hate Arnold but Conan was dope.

Anonymous ID: 19ee19 Nov. 30, 2018, 1:33 a.m. No.4083475   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4083436

I'm too bored to continue my larp. And i kind of miss the Jesus shills. They were working so hard.

 

So ima spam Jesus Christ superstar. The most shockingly quality rock opera. Which pissed everyone off because Judas was a nigger. But he was so fucking good nobody cared.

Anonymous ID: 19ee19 Nov. 30, 2018, 2:03 a.m. No.4083575   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3587

>>4083559

Lol. I know that feeling.

 

One of my 'one day' projects has always been a children's book. Just seems like a nice medium to make simple conceptually sound stories.

 

World definitely needs some basic human decency in children's media and you could do it locked in your apt, anon.

Anonymous ID: 19ee19 Nov. 30, 2018, 2:59 a.m. No.4083761   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3763

>>4083735

Personally i think Beanz is pretty and I'm horrified that anons would be so mean to her just because of the dozens of preposterous shitstorms her shill faggotry has caused over the course of literally years between here and pol.

 

This division between Beanz shills/fucking literal retards and everyone else IS NOT WHAT Q RESEARCH IS ABOUT!!!! We need to join forces and show a united front between anons and Beanz. That's what loving good Christians would do and Q said Godstuff and digg or something.

 

Tldr: subscribe to Beanz channel or you hurt Trump.

Anonymous ID: 19ee19 Nov. 30, 2018, 3:09 a.m. No.4083789   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4083778

When did Google decide manipulating search results in any way was a good idea? This problem seems like it should be handled at its roots and that's the root.

 

Nobody considers manipulating results based on politics unless they are already entirely accustomed to manipulating the search results for other reasons.

Anonymous ID: 19ee19 Nov. 30, 2018, 3:35 a.m. No.4083852   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3866

>>4083840

Nah. Maybe. But nah. There's nothing new here. Nothing.

 

I'd call it filler, but who the fuck needs filler right now. It's too slow to be a sudden reaction slide to shut down a convo. It took me a while to notice.

Anonymous ID: 19ee19 Nov. 30, 2018, 3:40 a.m. No.4083863   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3864

>>4083845

Then you should lurk. This shits been a thing for years. It's not always on here.

 

Tiresias is a fucking tard but he's not entirely wrong. And many understand this. And you sound like someone trying to understand how we know. Do your own homework.