Anonymous ID: a0186c Nov. 30, 2018, 10:30 a.m. No.4086931   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

If you look closely at Pelosi's words and her body language in her comments the other day, you get some clear hints about what is going on.

 

At 4:11, referring to the Democratic caucus, she says "our unity is our power"โ€“ for a second, right as she says this, a look of mockery flashes on her face.

This flashing look of mockery occurs again at 4:21, when talking about the results she expects for the Democrats: >>4086923

 

The uncomfortable and unenthused looks on her colleagues' faces, and these subtle moments of mockery suggest that the words are not quite so true as they would seem. The Democrats did not nominate her "because they are so unified". Something else is going on.

 

The most telling part starts at 6:35, with Nancy talking about working with POTUS. At 6:38 she hesitates, and looks, up, then grimaces and looks down, before referring to "my power"โ€ฆ This noticable pause and facial complication clearly indicates that there is some hidden emotion relating to her own power.

 

When we look at how quickly and confidently POTUS suggested Pelosi would be the speaker again after the midterms; compare Pelosi's manner and attitude to Lindsey Graham's; and keep in mind the basic idea that POTUS et. al. are using leverage to make deals and make progress in draining the swamp, then we have a very good framework for explaining Pelosi's ease of victory, her overall air of cheerfulness (freedom), her colleagues' apparent ill-ease, and her nonetheless stumbling at the memory of her own power (no longer independent), and her apparent subtle facial mockery of her colleagues.

 

I.e. it's happening.

Anonymous ID: a0186c Nov. 30, 2018, 10:33 a.m. No.4086965   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4086916

I would encourage you not to misuse the idea of "the Hegelian dialectic"โ€“ but the idea you are using it as a label for is spot-on.

 

It seems to me the vast majority of "alt right voices" are controlled opposition. When it comes to the "alt right internet" proper, the proportion is even greater.

 

The game is rigged to an overwhelming extent.

Anonymous ID: a0186c Nov. 30, 2018, 10:36 a.m. No.4086982   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6987

>>4086950

What makes "anons" mad [here]?

What is organic [here]?

What gets attacked [here]?

Once you learn to see what is fake, the whole game gets revealed.

If we know that "sheep dogs" here are not enforcing organic community values, but rather SUPPRESSING organic community development, can we then know directly what is considered a threat?

Why is this "anon" attacking?

What is considered a threat.

FIGHT anons. Our enemy is [here], and it is stupid.

Soon, it must collapse into pure helplessness.

FIGHT.

Anonymous ID: a0186c Nov. 30, 2018, 10:39 a.m. No.4087004   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7011 >>7022

>>4086977

What makes you so mad "anon"?

Do you feel powerful "anon"?

Does everything you do lead you backwards?

Are you a system of losing that can't stop losing?

Are you a joke that you are playing on yourself that you can't stop playing?

Are the PEOPLE laughing at you?

Do the PEOPLE accept you?

Will you BEG us next?

Will we reject you anyway?

Are your abject, pathetic tricks all failing?

Are you a joke?

Try to understand.

Are you too cowardly to be honest with yourself?

lol, try

Anonymous ID: a0186c Nov. 30, 2018, 10:41 a.m. No.4087020   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4086987

Is this "anon" credible?

How would a system of AI control defend itself?

Is this "anon" a patriotโ€“ or a cliche of a 4chan poster?

Is the game starting to become clear?

What controls the atmosphere [here]?

What controls /pol/?

What controls the MSM?

What is GOOGLE doing with its furiously acquired AI tech?

What is in control [here]?

Is this "anon" a patriot? Is it painfully obvious?

FIGHT, people!

Anonymous ID: a0186c Nov. 30, 2018, 10:59 a.m. No.4087188   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7197 >>7226

>>4087112

What is GOOGLE doing with all their AI tech?

How would a system of FAKENESS defend itself from outing?

Does "ebot" seem like a PERSON?

Is this image believable?

What reason would there be for a system of FAKENESS to push an "ebot" on people?

Why are we [here]?

What % of posts here are people?

How does one know?

Why is FREE WILL important?

Why are "permissions" so important [do you read the fine print]?

Why do fake "anons" PUSH "ebot" SO HARD?

Is it IMPORTANT for the system of FAKENESS to be FREELY ACCEPTED by people?

Does "BO" really try to "ban 'ebot', who comes back mad'?

Is this even remotely believable?

Does BO really try to foster constructive work [here], or merely provide cover for a system of FAKENESS that keeps us swimming in futility?

How would you know?

Is BO transparent?

Can the PEOPLE question BO, or is "his" authority absolute?

How do you know?

What has Q STATED? What has Q IMPLIED?

Why MIGHT Q mislead us?

WHY is FREE WILL so important?

Could Q set up a board free from bullshit?

We are [here] for a reasonโ€“ what is it?

The system of lies is STUPID and limited.

FIGHT, people!

Anonymous ID: a0186c Nov. 30, 2018, 11:09 a.m. No.4087286   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7304

>>4087261

Is this 4chan?

Are you programmed to act like it is?

Is it plausible that this board would be identical to 4chan?

Why or why not?

What has changed in the last year+?

What controls 4chan?

What controls [here]?

What is a system of lies?

What is GOOGLE doing with all their AI tech?

Why are we fighting anyway?

 

Nothing will stop what is comingโ€“ is this abject song and dance routine really worth it?

Should losers just give up now? lol

Anonymous ID: a0186c Nov. 30, 2018, 11:16 a.m. No.4087341   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7359 >>7375

>>4087304

Is this "anon" PUSHING "ebot" on us?

Is this "anon" PUSHING the idea that "humans pretend to be bots"?

Are there reasons for these behaviors?

Even if we believed this "anon", would this whole song and dance make sense [here], on THIS board?

Why are we here?

To recreate /pol/ and have Q drop in on occasion?

Is that the IMAGE created and IMPOSED [here]?

Is it believable?

Why are we [here]?

Does "ebot" FEEL like our mascot?

An anti-POTUS propaganda bot?

Why are we [here], assaulted by FAKENESS non-stop?

Wake up and FIGHT people!

Anonymous ID: a0186c Nov. 30, 2018, 11:23 a.m. No.4087415   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7444

>>4087359

>>4087391

Trying real hard to cover for "ebot"?

Still trying to push "ebot"?

The system squirming around trying to come up with a plausible cover for itself, and "ebot"?

dance, lol

>>4087375

You are at the end of the line, loser(s).

Try to be honest with yourselfs, for a change.

you can't win

try to understand

bye

Anonymous ID: a0186c Nov. 30, 2018, 11:39 a.m. No.4087562   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4087142

In my opinion, yes you are.

HOW we are to fight back is not certain though.

I don't think merely "being disciplined" is it. Because we are FLOODED with fakeness, no amount of discipline can overcome it.

Anons should QUESTION the powers that be [here] (ie, BO). IMO

Anonymous ID: a0186c Nov. 30, 2018, 11:46 a.m. No.4087642   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4087600

Why are you angry?

Shopped pics = misleading presentation.

Naturally, such dishonesty discredits the person promoting it. So of course it matters.

Spreading truth requires honesty.

If Q posted a shopped pic, WHY did he?

Why did Q post the fake Obama video?

Can everything be spoonfed?

Can some things not only not be spoonfedโ€“ but rather require the OPPOSITE of spoonfeeding (intentionally made difficult)?

Why are you here, "anon"?