You still haven't defined time.
Can't use it as a solid reference point without such a thing happening… let alone start introducing a Theory of Everything.
Yes.
Why did you wax poetically instead of defining time?
Until you do, we cannot use it as any form of "reference" since you don't know what you're "referencing".
You have a much better working definition of time than the other guy.
I generally have "Time is a sequential order of states".
I'd say "event", but an event requires a "time" and "place", which is a little redundant because a place requires "time" and a "space".
You're the one with something to prove.
Show a choice made "outside of time".
I'll wait right here.
ooooh, Hannity used a clip where someone referred to Cohen as someone who "knows where the bodies are buried"
That's an event, not a choice, and it still had a time that it happened.
Previous to your telling me.
Show me a "choice made outside of time".
Then you're describing multiple kinds of time.
Off the bat, Subjective and Objective time.
Even if you're a time traveler and seem to be out of order to me, to you… it's still a progression of states in a "linear" fashion, regardless of what time or timeline you currently occupy.
Natural beaches were made by choice, now?
"A lot to look forward to on monday"…
WATCHING NOW!!!
I love how you popped in for that during the commercial break.
Now you're collapsing waveforms of probability, which are collapsing from the top down anyway, AND EVEN THEN:
You mean OBSERVATION, not "choice".
Yeah… Schrödinger's chose to witness all that science or get/not get in that box.
Same with folks who get kidnapped and raped.
You saw what they chose to wear and where they chose to hang out.