///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

EDITED Q: IMPERATIVES/INJUNCTIONS/SUGGESTIONS/ORDERS. NOT COMPLETE TEXT, MUCH MISSING

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

ImperativesQ

pastebin.com/hJQH8brU

Anons!

Started something the other day: we were talking about tasks, so i thought i'd go and take the raw Q file and remove all the questions, to go and take just the orders/tasks/injunctions.

Interesting results, but turns out the process is not so simple as just taking out questions, because a lot of lines won't make much sense.

Of course a lot of info is lost anyway, but that's the point: to isolate just when Q told us specific things to do…

So i tried to take out as much as possible but also leave just enough in that it can be read/understood.

Sometimes i left a little bit more in because the drops were just too good/important, but this is NOT A BEST OF Q.

There is MUCH MISSING in this selection of crumbs, it is not at all complete (as some anons seemed to have thought of first draft of this project).

Copypasted here would make 9 posts of wall-of-text, so here's the pastebin:

ImperativesQ

pastebin.com/hJQH8brU

Doing this, i wasonce more shown how much it's instructive to be re-reading early crumbs now: lots of details that jump out and make you think (wait how did we forget this part? this is YUGE!)…

I strongly recommend you do the same/a version for you: download the latest raw txt file (pastebin.com/3YwyKxJE), and go through it, deleting extra lines. Make your own best of. Or focus on a specific subject/topic.

But having a focus/mission will help you go through the entire thing, and you definitely will get a fresh read on the entire Q drops (warning, it's pretty damn huge at this point), you will read things you forgot, you will find nuggets…

baker

previous incomplete version is in bread listed as:

>>393187 , >>393188 , >>393189 , >>393191 Separated list of Q orders/tasks/injunctions

Please remove/replace with this post and/or pastebin link, thanks!

>>409703

no, it's the same logic as having assets in/controlling Child Trafficking "prevention" Services.

Be the institution people/witnesses/whistleblowers contact, so you can control the info/187 as needed.

>>409789

Anons, follow this suggestion if you believe it, but it's also ok if you don't.

Trust the mission, but also trust yourselves.

Diversity of tactics apply.

We are here because of Q.

The Q drops are not for all, but for some they will be more potent than anything you can tell/meme them.

I, for one, do not agree with this order, but there's no reason to get bogged down in debate. Agree to disagree.

>>409237

>>409839

>CIA HQ

<NK

>>409870

well the whole point of using pop-culture references/expressions is that they are known and widely used, so you are going to see them here & there… be alert, ok, but be weary not to see connections were there aren't. I guess discernement/logic applies. Not all anons are equal there….

goddammit anons, getting drawn in endless debates over famefags…

What they do out there is their business. When they meddle in ours, then they are a problem to be dealt with, but otherwise it's as pointless as spending hours collecting every goddamned anon's 2cents on AJ