Interesting you posted this.
They were throwing around the discussion of "what constitutes an act of war" at the IC committee hearing this week. Threatening to possibly go to war with countries that meddle in our elections.
What is also interesting is that DHS says there were no Russian intervention in our election. There is also evidence that DHS actually hacked our voting systems.
Both Beanz and Potter (and sometimes Corsi) seem to be on the Q train when it helps them and off the Q train when they are not getting enough IRL evidence to back up Q posts.
The problem with YT'ers is that they need things to happen in a certain timeframe inorder to stay lucrative.
Yeah we need to knock it the hell off. I'm sure we are doing more in other countries' elections than the Russians did to ours.
https:// www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-new-documents-reveal-instances-classified-information-hillary-clintons-unsecure-non-state-gov-system/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
Gives you gas anyway.
That's what Q told @Jack about having Pelosi as a handler.
(((0cb886))) literally talking to himself. Can we get a ban here.
That's great to hear!
Can concur. I have a immediate family member with one of these.
CIA>SECUREDROP>GANNET/MSM
It's not any more complicated than that anons.
GLOBALEAKS goes the opposite direction:
Govt employee>GLOBALEAKS>MSM
Oh look at that, I filter you and you respond to me twice. Lurk or get a life and leave.
We need people to know about Q (the messenger behind the message) because eventually we will have to use our graphic proofs to show normies that what Q has stated is correct information. There will be a time when this is all blown wide open but there will be a lot of chaos and we will have to be the beacon of who they turn to for accurate, proven information they can rely on.
By authenticate so you mean verify? One of our jobs is to build graphic proofs that are our "auth tools" as Q has stated.