Anonymous ID: 007890 Nov. 30, 2018, 11:53 p.m. No.4098571   🗄️.is 🔗kun

If you are intending to sound like you are schizophrenic then you withhold the explanations until after the evidence is presented.

 

If you are intending to persuade others then you give one of the possible explanations before you drop the evidence.

 

For those who have been conditioned to only accept one official explanation from authority figures, cognitive bias prevents the full picture from being shared and understood.

 

I like sounding schizophrenic because it fucks with their heads more. When the light bulb turns on, they get all the information at once but you don't have to wait until you have all the evidence to start distributing it.

 

If I were to travel to some isolated native tribe I would bring glowsticks.

Anonymous ID: 007890 Dec. 1, 2018, 12:08 a.m. No.4098670   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8688 >>8698

>>4098589

If Q and friends really wanted to fuck with one of us, they could post an entire conversation you or I just had with our children, one sentence at a time or even a picture that's worth multiple sentences. Omit enough context (the pre shared key), and the individual realizes that unless they just experienced a 10000000:1 coincidence, Q or POTUS is talking directly to them, about those conversations.

 

Now go take another look at the MKUltra conspiracy theories.

Anonymous ID: 007890 Dec. 1, 2018, 12:46 a.m. No.4098879   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4098681

Given the surveillance capabilities of our intelligence services along with the artificially divided citizenry, military tribunals and cover stories for executions of high level players is a perfectly plausible solution to the classification of those capabilities.

 

Or it may be that so many people complained about the spooky decorations that POTUS told FLOTUS to make it red and green this year. Who Rick rolled the RNC?