I just figured. something out.

Around 6 pm, I was looking for a digg. I thought about listening to Hannity to see what was up. The whistleblower material sounded useful, so I transcribed and posted it.

I did not know at that time about POTUS Tweet re watching Hannity (about 12 mins after the hour). Or about Q's warning to leaker about revealing details on Clinton whistleblower (about 27 minutes).

What I did know was about when that conversation took place (about 20:20 after the hour on the YT video). May or may not be exactly right, but seemed like the right time to put. It crossed my mind that there was something about it being relevant to the election. Just my gut feeling. Useful??

>>4099459

Hmmm…not a numbers fag, but I was just writing about 20:20.

See

>>4099463

>>4099468

It was definitely posted, I saw it. But I've been on for about 8 hours, so not too helpful. Should be under the plane fag stuff, tho.

>>4099466

Yes, Fox is definitely comp'd. I've been watching blow by blow re the caravan coverage. And then of course there's the election coverage, which is even more obvious. Fox is included in the video as part of the MSM in the video "that will get Donald Trump elected." Not by mistake.

>>4099510

Yeah, the first thing Tucker mentioned when he visited Dave Rubin on Rubin's show was the freedom he [Rubin] had. Which is like saying "We don't have that freedom at Fox." He is very good at getting stuff across while sounding completely harmless. A REAL fox (a swampfox like Marion.)

>>4099514

Didn't think a historical treatise was in order. Recent examples suffice.

>>4099529

Yes, pseudo-MSMs who lurk here drop subtle clues that only anons would notice. Bongino too?

>>4099548

Sorry, but I'm a Tucker fan. Don't see him as fearmongering; Hannity is worse in that dept, IMO. But the night crew do the best with what they have; there are limits, as you must know.

QUESTION:

How did POTUS know to tell us to watch Hannity tonight about 8 mins before the discussion on whistleblowers?

>>4099608

I learned a lot from Icke, but no, he's not pro-Trump. People with strong personalities are good at trailblazing (like Trump!) but don't change their ideas easily or fall in line with other dominant personalities. Like grizzlies.

>>4099624

Yeah Bongino's badass, I'm not dissing him! Brilliant mind, sharp like a laser. Highest respect.

>>4099631

Comey did have a dog:

"I’m in an armchair with the laptop on my actual lap but atop one of those “read-in-bed” boards to make a better angle for typing. Our loyal, and old, rescue-dog, Benji, is asleep somewhere near my chair. I’m listening to classical music."

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/12/books/review/james-b-comey-by-the-book.html

>>4099664

Owls see everything.

Also associated with Athena, wisdom, but also UFOs (screen memories) for some people.

Many associations, people differ in outlook. Symbols often interpreted negatively by some here, because of cabal symbolism.

For me, a positive symbol of transformation.

>>4099679

Very, very intense, found myself in the middle of the Hannity Q warning thing, fastest breads I've seen in the pm. Still trying to sort it out. Amazing tho. A red letter day.

>>4099696

Do you know exactly when the graph plunged?

>>4099713

Yes, I considered that. Comey says he was old, so it would be easy.

>>4099602

Context? I'm not sure what you're asking.

>>4099712

Replied to your original post asking for more context.

>>4099783

I don't know about Nellie Orr and Huber leaks, since she's associated with Fusion GPS and the dossier….

But I still want to know why POTUS twatted to watch Hannity just 8 minutes before the discussion on Hannity about the leak.

Did POTUS just find out?

Hannity, Sara & John obviously all knew before the discussion.

Something doesn't add up here. If POTUS knew, did he want the info leaked?

If so, why did Q give out such a strong warning?