My take on this Q post:

>Clown Agency>No Such Agency.

C Agency will be dissolved and the rest of the good agents will become a part of No Such Agency (">" is an arrow)

>RIP JFK - we will succeed.

We will achieve to do, what JFK began

>Pyramid will collapse.

The power structure of the bad actors will collapse.

>Think shell.

A shell structure is a raw building, the part of a structure which is providing its static.

If you weaken its static, by taking important parts of the structure away, it must and will collapse.

>Q

To see the word "shell" as a raw bulding, that will collapse, if important parts were taken out, is not as exiting as other interpretations, but it makes a lot of sense in the context Q gave in this post.

>>410041

I've read your link. This shell structure isn't the shell structure, as in raw building. What do you want to tell me?

>>410050

I know, it has been discussed. But does it fit better into the context of Q's post than my interpretation?

>>410033

And context for JK is John Kerry (not Kushner). Or do you think that Trump is an idiot?

>>410038

As far as I know, the Queen is the richest person on earth. Why would bankers control the richest client?