TheoryAnon here proposing the ‘pen theory’.

Quoting Q: “CLOCK and the GRAPHIC are essential”

Inferred meaning: TIMING and the FULL PICTURE are essential

The full picture is the Q-posts built into a web and the timing is the clock/markers/mirror. These two things are supposed to synergize together as proof and shine the light that saves humanity. Also another thing Q says all the time is that ‘everything has meaning’, so piggy backing off that idea that everything has meaning, why does Q post 3 pictures of the same pen but rotated differently each time(dec 12, jan 6, jan 24)? Could there be hidden meaning here?

The reason I even considered this path is because the pen is posted three times so there has to be some sort of purpose to the pen, and the second pic of the pen quoted a connection made between the first pen picture about it being a [10] marker, and then it hit me,

What if the pen is a hand of a clock moving.

My analysis consists of the pen and its possible connection to the clock, markers (timestamps), and the mirror date. Pictures will be drawings since I suck at graphic design.

Some questions I would like to answer:

If everything has meaning, then why did Q post the same pen 3 different times each rotated differently?

If everything has meaning, then why did Q respond with pen picture 2 to a post that connected the first pen as a [10] marker (or OP -10 as the OP is proposing)?

Is Q using the same rotating pen as one of the hands of a clock?

Is Q inferring that the pen points to different “time stamps” or “markers”

By Q posting 3 different points of a rotating pen, supposed to infer the rate at which the clock rotates?

The speed at which events unfold?

If 12/23 is the mirror date, does the clock follow the mirror in reverse?

This is my transformation of the pen angles into the hand of a clock assuming the cap of the pen is where it's pointing. I have extra columns for the total span of days being 43 and the difference between each pen posting in days. Also I thought I could create a mini delta with the pen angles on the side.

These are representations for the turning of of the pen based off the current 12/23 mirror theory going around. CW = clockwise and CCW = counter clockwise. A and B’s only difference is the way at which the CW and CCW are placed on either side of the mirror date. If an arrow is pointing to a dotted line, it means that's where it will be for the next pen position. If an arrow originates at a dotted line it means the pen was there and has now moved to the solid line for the current date. The arrow in B, jan 24, should not be there since there is no future pen picture, my bad. Overall I don’t see anything to stand out personally.

For C and D, I removed the mirror date and tried out continuous motion both CCW and CW respectively. Personally I like all three pen motion being continuous to each other. C is like the clock is turned CCW and the day difference of 25 (dec 12 jan 6) looks proportionally less the jan 6 to jan 24’s 18 day difference, so that looks inconsistent and less viable. D, However looks more proportional for the day difference as more distance is traveled in dec 12 (25 days) compared to jan 6 to jan 24 (18 days), this motion could have some potential. Even though D is more realistic then C, I use C in future models because of its simplicity in drawing the arrows (no overlap this way).

For E and F, I chose continuous CCW motion for arrow simplicity and applied it to the phase 1 and phase 2 crumbs. Here, all three pens are on the same diagram and the direction of pen motion is shown by the arrow above the dec 12-jan 6- jan 24 pen angles (like a chicken foot). E is different from A-D because it implies that there is a beginning and end date outside of the original pen post dates, signified by the dotted lines and not to scale. Somebody can propose a start and end date (I am a theoryanon not a mathanon lol). Figure on the left of E is only showing the motion of phase 1 assuming beginning and end dates are found. In F, I tried to show the dotted line being the end of phase 1 and the beginning of phase 2 changing directions and going CW to mimick a mirror idea of predicting future events.

G I personally like because it incorporates Q’s ‘Wind the CLOCK’ phrase before Q says ‘The CLOCK and the GRAPHIC are ESSENTIAL.’ in the jan 7 post. This setup involves the ‘end’ dotted position being the end of phase 1, and the dotted arrow back to the beginning is the actual winding the clock back motion. Once its wound back to the start, phase 2 begins the cycle over again, also has implications of predicting events. In H, I begin to introduce the idea of markers and time stamps. The dec 12 arrow means that when the pen is in that position its pointing at the [10] marker, the jan 6 and jan 24 marker have yet to be determined. The [10] marker for dec 12 is verified by Q’s second pen posting.

I is the incorporation of H into clock form with the markers as stationary points (most would need to be identified in the future) and days passing being the motion of the clock moving. Although, as stated back in the comparison of C and D, it was determined that a clockwise motion makes more sense for motion of the pen then the CCW motion used here. J is the application of clock movement to the mirror date, although now looking at it would not make sense since dec 23 is in the clock and the reflection would go back the other way, that is not depicted accurately here.

K is the markers or the sum of markers being the reason for motion of the clock and the pen’s would just be pointing to that date of there posting. These posts and theory would hopefully generate a new idea for someone else reading as I don’t know where to go from here. There has to be some reason for the pen postings and eventually we can figure out how the markers fit into a clock. Or I am being to autistic over this and it just means they are signing something important on each day they post a pen.

>>536385

I am curious why you are putting more emphasis on [15] and [1] over [0],[5],[10]. If all of these are confirmed markers (is [0] confirmed?) then why not include the 0,5,10 into your analysis? It makes sense why you emphasize [1], but why emphasize [15] so much if it means distant past?

What if the signatures Q always leaves behind are code names for the operations that were currently ongoing and that could explain why we don't see certain signatures again because those operations were completed. And the [15].[10],[5],[1],[0] are helping us organize the operations in order of when they happened. This may explain why a certain signature Q uses, comes back in some way and have mirrored [1]'s so often.

>>672799

Just seeing this now, I did not archieve it but the writer's name is SerialBrain2.

https:// www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/84g4bc/you_the_people_have_all_the_power_you_simply/

his lasts post. I did get a good look at his work and will try to recreate his matrix method, if not found in other places

>>789234

SerialBrain2 is better at archiving then me, he collected most of his files into a downloaded link, file 10 is where he mentions the matrix method but the work I saw is not there sadly. As of ten days ago he proclaims:

"In the meantime, download and spread the posts: http:// www.filedropper.com/garden

And this image will show you which method you need to master…"