Anonymous ID: 750494 Dec. 1, 2018, 1:28 p.m. No.4105337   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5388

>>4105306 (lb)

why would any reasonable person trust 'anybody' else?

 

Because to go through life never trusting anyone is a terrible way to live and unless/until there's solid reason not to trust an individual the default rational person will allow some trust.

 

So you've chosen not to trust someone, why should anyone trust 'your' opinion then? Particularly when all you've provided is a bombastic statement

Anonymous ID: 750494 Dec. 1, 2018, 2:12 p.m. No.4105836   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5922 >>5967

>>4105798

>>4105759

>>4105794

 

Dan's podcast #628 - look at the timeline

https://omny.fm/shows/the-dan-bongino-show/ep-628-the-biggest-scandal-in-american-history-is

Published Jan 8, 2018 8:40 AM

 

I have long maintained that if Dan isn't directly involved in the Q team he's certainly being directly read-in and given talking points.

 

Dan, Sara Carter, Jon Solomon, Hannity and a handful of others.

 

It's necessary to end-run around the 4 am talking points and 'we' here can only do so much - there needs to be main stream figures as well, for it to be successful.

 

So yes, of course, it's expected that all of them will drop 'hints' but never directly confirm until (if even then) it comes out in the open.