A DECLARATION OF WAR ON CENTIPEDE 2/4
Rebuttal 3/8
Around the time of the Christmas Tree lighting ceremony, there was a lot of fuckery going on. From the red dots on POTUS during his speech, to the abrupt way in which POTUS left the press pool behind, to the journalist posting the photo “in bad judgement” of the crosshairs over POTUS, something was definitely going on. Very few Anons were even saying it was MOS at the time, but you instantly jumped in to exculpate MOS. We know that the cabal loves to signal their killings because they believe it is a way to free themselves from the karmic ramifications of their actions, just like in Q Post#1760 when Michael Avenatti posted the photo of plane in crosshairs the same week as the missile was launched at AF1 in Alaska or when George Bush was at the elementary school on the morning of 9/11 and had the children read out these words repeatedly “KITE, HIT, STEEL, PLANE, MUST!” So don’t even begin to tell me no attempts were made when that piece of shit posted a photo of the crosshairs on POTUS.
In your post you also change my words to “MOS hangout” and then say [whatever that means] when what I had called you out on is being a “limited hangout”. Why lie about what I said if you weren’t afraid of Anons looking up the meaning of “limited hangout”: A limited hangout or partial hangout is, according to former special assistant to the Deputy Director of the Central Intelligence Agency Victor Marchetti, "spy jargon for a favorite and frequently used gimmick of the clandestine professionals. When their veil of secrecy is shredded and they can no longer rely on a phony cover story to misinform the public, they resort to admitting—sometimes even volunteering—some of the truth while still managing to withhold the key and damaging facts in the case. The public, however, is usually so intrigued by the new information that it never thinks to pursue the matter further."
You claim that my charges of sidestepping obvious MOS connections are unsubstantiated, but they are very well founded. 21 weeks ago you made a post about Awan, and said literally zero about his connections to MOS even though in Q Post#916 (roughly 36 weeks ago) Q fingered them as being the real force behind Awan. Approximately 31 weeks ago, you did a piece on MYSTERY PAKISTANIS related to Awan and once again were completely mute about the MOS connection. 39 weeks ago you did a post about false flags and mentioned the assassination of JFK, may his soul shine for eternity, but once again said nothing about JFK rejecting the plan to give Israel a nuclear reactor prior to his assassination. In that same post you mentioned conflicting accounts being a dead giveaway of a false flag and mentioned 9/11, but said nothing of the witnesses who saw “the dancing Israelis” after the towers fell, or how they were apprehended and set loose on orders from the highest levels of the traitors in US government at the time. 52 weeks ago you did a post on 9/11 and fingered the Saudis for their part in that most heinous of crimes against humanity, but once again brought no attention to the “Israeli art students” who were instrumental in setting the charges that brought the towers down, or the “dancing Israelis”. Because you reveal part of the truth but repeatedly omit MOS connections, your page is the very definition of limited hangout