Anonymous ID: e9f262 Dec. 1, 2018, 3:16 p.m. No.4106539   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6599 >>6692 >>6704

>>4106490

you can't talk about miles per HOUR when trying to give a definition of TIME.

 

Even if TIME is on a different angle than the other dimensions, you're still not giving a usable understanding of what it is.

 

You're saying that all time is subjective without taking into account the passage of time where there is no observer.

 

A small rock floating through space, for example. No one's there to observe it.

Anonymous ID: e9f262 Dec. 1, 2018, 3:30 p.m. No.4106714   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6744

>>4106666

You mean like a Mobius strip in the 5th Dimension.

Think of it like a Riemann space if you wanna go batshit with it, but the line can be straightened out to appear linear.

 

Example: You're a time traveler and you go 1600, 1800, 800, current day.

Outside of your perspective, it would appear as it your age wasn't determinate on when reported sightings of you came up.

 

But you… that timeline is "straight", which is effectively where you're getting time is "subjective", but then you completely ignore the objective time that all of this happens in.

Which even then, may be said to be subjective to that dimension and beholden to the more "objective" dimensions above it, but there would still be a highest Objective Time.

Anonymous ID: e9f262 Dec. 1, 2018, 3:34 p.m. No.4106746   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6779

>>4106723

Wrong. You start getting into multiple observers or simultaneous observations, in the way you're describing it.

 

Consider the 6th dimension where you can move forward and backwards on a timeline since the 5th dimension.

 

In the 6th dimension, you still have the same start conditions, but have multiple endings you can jump to… saaaay… from construction worker to programmer and how that would effect your timeline. There's still an observational focal tie.

 

You're going backwards.

Anonymous ID: e9f262 Dec. 1, 2018, 3:36 p.m. No.4106769   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6834

>>4106744

I'd hope so because at this rate we're going to end up proofing the necessity of a "higher state being" because at the top level, the Divine Observer is collapsing all possible event wave functions from the sea of Infinity. Infinity-1 is still infinity, don't worry.

 

From those waveforms of probability, they're collapsed further as you traverse down the dimensions… until you end up here where the event (in focus, in this case) is happening.