Anonymous ID: 120fb6 Feb. 17, 2018, 12:02 p.m. No.410885   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0904 >>1198 >>1358 >>1455

>>391887

 

Legal anon, here. Not necessarily so. Remember, the fruit of the poisonous tree only applies to regular court (State or Federal) prosecutions. Q has clearly stated that these people will be tried via military tribunals. When dealing with national security and treason, via military tribunals, the evidentiary standards are different. Besides, once something is denied by the alleged perpetrator even in regular court, non-admissible evidence can be used for the purpose of "impeaching" false testimony! That's how it comes in! Stick to what you know, because you don't know the law!

 

Disagree about our purpose here, also!. Q has stated on numerous occasions that our purpose here is to get the general public/sleeping masses prepared for the arrests and disclosures to come, by changing the narrative, and offering proofs of what is really going on! Nothing to do with "parallel construction!"

 

Not saying that you are a shill, just uninformed and misguided! Go back and read or re-read the crumbs, before you post crap like this!

Anonymous ID: 120fb6 Feb. 17, 2018, 12:13 p.m. No.410997   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1066 >>1246

>>410904

 

For a judge to be impeached, usually just reserved for federal judges who get a lifetime appointment (state judges can be recalled or voted out of office), they have to commit some kind of crime like take a bribe to influence their decision in a case. So unfortunately, the worst unconstitutional decisions made by the liberal judges in the 9th Circuit for example, can not be impeached for decisions made in their official capacity! They have to be "dirty."