>>4108098 lb

>Anons, I found concrete…

>I almost forgot until I remembered my own forum lectures on the subject of nuclear proliferation.

>Fly ash is a major source for Uranium and Carbon 14 isotopes.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/coal-ash-is-more-radioactive-than-nuclear-waste/

https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/1997/fs163-97/FS-163-97.html

>Sources for pic related.

>Fly ash is used in concrete.

https://www.thebalancesmb.com/fly-ash-applications-844761

>Not sure if someone else made the connection, yet - but it all fits with the subject of U1, concrete, clinton foundation fuckery and nuclear warheads in NK…. Which has one of the largest concrete factories in the world….

>Having trouble finding my source on it - but it was in some research I was doing a while back regarding NK's foreign debts - back in the 60s they took out a fuckton of loans for a great leap forward and part of the deal was a massive concrete factory for no reason… Which was recently sold to a French firm, if memory serves.

>

Shamelessly self-reposting as I came in toward the end of last bread.

Updating with info on NK concrete sector:

http://www.nkeconwatch.com/category/dprk-organizations/companies/sangwon-cement-factory/

https://www.cemnet.com/News/story/138643/oci-invests-in-north-korea.html

http://ssangyongcement.co.kr/jsp/eng/company/com05.htm

The following is an older article from global security regarding a concrete tie production factory… I'm including it because global security has it, and I am trying to figure out if there is a defense related concern with the company.

https://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/dprk/2004/05/dprk-040527-rok-mou02.htm

The following is a link to a Q/A type thread discussion on the issue of coal ash as it pertains to radioactive material concerns. Basically COAL ASH IS A POTENTIAL SOURCE OF URANIUM AND IS NOT WELL REGULATED WHILE ALSO BEING WIDELY USED IN CONCRETE PRODUCTION. In other words… A concrete processing facility would be ideal for the isolation of Uranium from fly ash.

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Why_is_coal_ash_more_radioactive_than_nuclear_waste_and_what_is_the_exact_reason

>>4108647

Points of light. Stars. They thought we would follow the stars. Points of light referenced by GHWB being charities used as front operations and slush funds by the CIA. These are two fold, acting as an entry point for funds that can be directed into clandestine activities and as a platform through which to steer the efforts of generous people. The good intentions of people with limited knowledge can be used to facilitate many things they would find horrendous if they understood the end result.

Consider… Did all of the LGBTQRS666 groups start off as rabid and hateful? The people in them probably didn't. Not anywhere near the majority of them, at least. They started off believing the idea that we should love and take care of each other regardless of how they are choosing to live. They were then encouraged to become more fixated on this idea and were presented opponents who were shown as angry and resentful. So on and so forth until they believe that the people opposed to their political objectives are radical, hateful people. There is no shortage of actors staged for either side's enjoyment, either. Are the radical feminists "real people" - or are they characters erected for the purpose of war? Some may have built their own character for war - but even those are facades.

If I am making any sense. Kind of rambling a bit.

>>4108973

If I may be shameless and mention my own contribution:

>>4108489

It's kind of a busy news day, so more nuanced information is easily missed - but I have about 70% confidence I have concrete.