Anonymous ID: cae7db Dec. 2, 2018, 12:04 a.m. No.4111742   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>4111418

 

I'm REALLY curious about what was going on with this, too–not about the identity of the whistleblower (to be kept under wraps) but just whole ruse. POTUS tweeting to whole world and Q comms to us exactly when the conversation with Sara and John ended, down to the second or very close.

Anonymous ID: cae7db Dec. 2, 2018, 12:23 a.m. No.4111827   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1862

My >>4111802

 

Won't happen. They're lying, they know it and don't care. The stuff they say about us is horrendous. They think words are actions. They hate the words and want to silence the speakers. We must be doing something right.

Anonymous ID: cae7db Dec. 2, 2018, 12:43 a.m. No.4111900   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>4111879

I had a feeling for years that my "life plan" had gotten screwed up by circumstance so I was in limbo. It's like everything had to be reworked.

 

People have many strange experiences they cannot explain.

Anonymous ID: cae7db Dec. 2, 2018, 12:58 a.m. No.4111959   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>4111927

 

It's not exactly rational in the usual sense, it's synchronicity–like the magic of hive mind. Things happen just the way they are meant to without "normal" planning. I decided to write out the transcript for the whistleblower stuff on Hannity wo knowing that Potus said to watch Hannity; I just felt like it. Then Q shows up and finds it immediately and posts it. How would Q know I was going to type that? It was a spontaneous impulse. Stuff like this is meaningful but how it works….who knows??

Anonymous ID: cae7db Dec. 2, 2018, 1:20 a.m. No.4112057   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>2096

>>4111921

 

Uranium One: FBI Refuses To Release Three-Dozen Secret Memos Involving Clintons, Russia And Obama

 

 

Here is the article:

 

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-10-02/uranium-one-fbi-refuses-release-three-dozen-secret-memos-involving-clintons-russia

Anonymous ID: cae7db Dec. 2, 2018, 1:37 a.m. No.4112124   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>2143

>>4111956

 

I am not saying that. I am quite familiar with David's work and respect it. But the way it is presented here–repeatedly, which is the mark of shillery in this forum– and often with blue chickens re Corey Goode–it has no positive impact. When it first appeared it was in that context–and full of mockery. If you're sincere, you'll need a better approach. If you're not, then don't worry about it.