Anonymous ID: 22287d Dec. 2, 2018, 5:02 a.m. No.4112748   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2760 >>2788 >>2815 >>2860

"Cain had also obtained official whistleblower status from DOJ IG Horowitz. "

 

sauce:

https://www.theepochtimes.com/the-common-thread-behind-four-investigations_2728104.html

 

HOW DOES ONE OBTAIN 'OFFICIAL WHISTLEBLOWER STATUS'?

Did Cain/Cain's Attorney have a joint prosecution agreement with the DOJ?

 

JOINT PROSECUTION AGREEMENTS

(5)—Sharing Privileged Information Between Government and

Relator: The Joint Prosecution Privilege.

Sharing of information between the Government and the relator does not waive

either the attorney-client privilege or the work product protections. The courts

have long recognized that communication between two parties with a common

interest or communications between counsel and such parties in the presence of

the other party with a common interest does not waive either the attorney-client

privilege or the work product doctrine.6

 

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia has now expressly

ruled that information shared between the relator, his counsel and the United

States is protected from discovery by the joint-prosecutorial privilege.75

 

In fact, the unique relationship arising from the statutory requirement that the

relator serve upon the United States a “written disclosure of substantially all

material evidence and information the person possesses”79 requires the sharing of

work product generated by the relator and his attorney in order for the case to

proceed.80 Such material disclosed to the United States is protected from

discovery by the joint-prosecutorial privilege.81

 

http://slabbed.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/from-branch-opposition-to-compel-exhibit-1.pdf

 

THAT SAID, THE FBI RAID ON THIS WHISTLEBLOWER IS VERY ODD!

Anonymous ID: 22287d Dec. 2, 2018, 5:10 a.m. No.4112788   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2815 >>2860

>>4112748

MOAR ON JOINT PROSECUTION AGREEMENTS W/WHISTLEBLOWERS

 

"Be prepared to sign an information-sharing “joint prosecution” agreement. The Department of Justice makes signing such an agreement a precondition for allowing qui tam attorneys and their clients to review documents the government obtains. The agreement (which will be one-sided and probably not subject to negotiation) will require your client to agree not to use government-obtained documents to file a new case or expand her present one."

 

https://www.vsg-law.com/blog/a-qui-tam-attorneys-guide-bringing-suit-for-the-king/

 

District courts

are not entirely clear

about how to apply

joint-prosecution

privilege in qui tam

actions in which the

government does not

intervene. Some hold

that the privilege

survives a decision

not to intervene,

because even a non-intervening government

retains significant power as a “real party

in interest”: the U.S. is a named plaintiff,

it has the right to be served with copies of

pleadings and depositions, and it may stay

plaintiff’s discovery when that discovery

hinders another government case.But other

courts hold that giving information to the

government waives privilege, never bothering

to discuss joint-prosecution privilege

(assuming it was asserted).4

 

https://www.employmentattorneyca.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Qui-Tam-2018-CLE-Course-Book.pdf

Anonymous ID: 22287d Dec. 2, 2018, 5:11 a.m. No.4112801   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4112760

>He obviously gave them bad info the first time (smokescreen?) or with held the REAL info.

I'm thinking he violated the joint prosecution agreement somehow.