Anonymous ID: b654a4 Dec. 2, 2018, 5:40 a.m. No.4112953   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3058 >>3060

If you look closely at Pelosi's words and her body language in her comments the other day, you get some clear hints about what is going on.

 

At 4:11, referring to the Democratic caucus, she says "our unity is our power"โ€“ for a second, right as she says this, a look of mockery flashes on her face.

This flashing look of mockery occurs again at 4:21, when talking about the results she expects for the Democrats: >>4112947

 

The uncomfortable and unenthused looks on her colleagues' faces, and these subtle moments of mockery suggest that the words are not quite so true as they would seem. The Democrats did not nominate her "because they are so unified". Something else is going on.

 

The most telling part starts at 6:35, with Nancy talking about working with POTUS. At 6:38 she hesitates, and looks, up, then grimaces and looks down, before referring to "my power"โ€ฆ This noticable pause and facial complication clearly indicates that there is some hidden emotion relating to her own power.

 

When we look at how quickly and confidently POTUS suggested Pelosi would be the speaker again after the midterms; compare Pelosi's manner and attitude to Lindsey Graham's; and keep in mind the basic idea that POTUS et. al. are using leverage to make deals and make progress in draining the swamp, then we have a very good framework for explaining Pelosi's ease of victory, her overall air of cheerfulness (freedom), her colleagues' apparent ill-ease, and her nonetheless stumbling at the memory of her own power (no longer independent), and her apparent subtle facial mockery of her colleagues.

 

I.e. it's happening.

Anonymous ID: b654a4 Dec. 2, 2018, 5:50 a.m. No.4113015   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4112990

What is organic [here]?

Is this /pol/?

Is this "anon" a patriot that is [here] to fight with us?

Or is this "anon" fake (ie, a bot) that portrays a stereotyped "chan" character?

How do you know?

Is this /pol/?

This board started a year agoโ€“ what sort of people did it attract?

People that come to this otherwise OBSCURE board to SIMULATE /pol/?

How would that make sense? It wouldn't.

And yet, do we see SIMULATED /pol/, enforced by simulated "anons", day after day after day [here]?

What is creating all the fake posts?

Russia?

Why are we [here], with patriots' posts drowned in FAKENESS?

There is a reasonโ€“ but what is it?

Anonymous ID: b654a4 Dec. 2, 2018, 5:53 a.m. No.4113026   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Question for Q: can you tell us why we are on this board, where /pol/ is emulated and a fake image of it enforced on us, discourse is FORCIBLY kept at a low level, patriots are harassed, and the "BO" fosters all of the preceding?

Thank you.

Anonymous ID: b654a4 Dec. 2, 2018, 6:35 a.m. No.4113232   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

What is more important to this board:

  1. "the chans"

or

  1. "The Storm"

?

What difference does this make to "the culture"?

What do our enemies want to promote [here]?

What is hopeful, and what is cynical and self-defeating?

What creates the atmosphere of this board?

What % of posts is organic?

How do you know?

What are tech giants doing with all their AI technology?

Saving it for something?

Patriots fightโ€“ where? When? How?

Why are we [here]?

FIGHT PATRIOTS

Anonymous ID: b654a4 Dec. 2, 2018, 6:54 a.m. No.4113357   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3369 >>3371 >>3383

>>4113327

What is this board?

Just "a chan"?

We are just [here] to jerk off?

THIS IS NOT REALISTIC.

What is this movement?

What does it representโ€“ historically?

You can't pretend to be part of this movement.

You can't portray pointless, unpatriotic attitudes and pretend you are part of this movement.

This board isn't /pol/.

It would be NONSENSE to think it would have been.

Why is this FAKE image pushed?

Why is discourse dominated by fake "anons" that do nothing but seek to keep us mired in pointless futility?

The fake image forced on us isn't even plausibleโ€“ are the humans here EVER going to wake up and fight?

WHY are we [here]?

JUST LOOK AT THE POSTS.

Stop being mindless sheep and LOOK at what fills up OUR spaceโ€“ why?

If you aren't ASKING, you aren't FIGHTING

IT IS UP TO US TO FIGHT

Anonymous ID: b654a4 Dec. 2, 2018, 7:01 a.m. No.4113416   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3437 >>3583

>>4113383

The FAKENESS [here] is overwhelming.

It is overwhelming by SHEER VOLUME.

If this board is 98%+ fake posts, then WHY are we [here]?

"We are here for a reason"โ€“ what is it?

"We can guide, but you must uncover the truth organically"โ€“ what are we waiting for?

PEOPLEโ€“ please wake up. The fakeness is so flagrant, it often doesn't even bother to TRY to disguise itself.

Look at this "anon"โ€“ a perfect example of the fake "chan" character that is used to DOMINATE this board.

Why don't the PEOPLE fight?

STOP being passive.

STOP being sheep.

 

What is a sheep dog?

What keeps the people passive here?

What is the relationship between a DOG and a WOLF?

What is "a wolf in sheep's clothing"?

What roles do a sheep dog and a wolf play relative to each other, and to a SHEEP?

Sheep no more?

Or "sheep more!"?

Why are we [here]?

WAKE THE FUCK UP AND FIGHT PEOPLE

Anonymous ID: b654a4 Dec. 2, 2018, 7:25 a.m. No.4113603   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4113583

Does posting this help your agenda, because humans, for some reason, do what you are cueing them to do?

Or does it do the opposite, since the few humans that are curious enough to figure out what you are trying to convey are more suspicious of your efforts to promote censorship than they are likely to trust you?

Just curious, "anon".

lol, keep flailing, idiotbots.

you can't win

humans are BETTER than you

sorry