MOAR DOJ POLICY CHANGES ANNOUNCED BY [RR] THIS PAST THURSDAY

RR gave a speech on Thursday re: White Collar crime and better inter-agency cooperation.

sauce:

https://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/deputy-attorney-general-rod-j-rosenstein-delivers-remarks-american-conference-institute-0

<HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE SPEECH

FOCUS ON INDIVIDUAL WRONGDOERS

"Last year, we initiated a review of our Department’s policy concerning individual accountability in corporate cases, to consider suggestions by our own employees and outside stakeholders about opportunities for improvements that will promote efficient enforcement and reduce fraud. "

"Under our revised policy, pursuing individuals responsible for wrongdoing will be a top priority in every corporate investigation."

SEE PIC

CRIMINAL CASES VS CIVIL CASES

CRIMINAL.."ALL OR NOTHING" APPROACH

A CORPORATE RESOLUTION SHOULD NOT PROTECT INDIVIDUALS FROM CRIMINAL LIABILITY

"Our revised policy also makes clear that any company seeking cooperation credit in criminal cases must identify every individual who was substantially involved in or responsible for the criminal conduct. "

>There were concerns about the inefficiency of requiring companies to identify every employee involved…

In fact, we learned that the policy was not strictly enforced in some cases because it would have impeded resolutions and wasted resources. Our policies need to work in the real world of limited investigative resources.

CREDIT FOR COOPERATION

"If we find that a company is not operating in good faith to identify individuals who were substantially involved in or responsible for wrongdoing, we will not award any cooperation credit. "

CIVIL CASES ARE DIFFERENT - 'ALL OR NOTHING' APPROACH DOESN'T WORK

"The primary goal of affirmative civil enforcement cases is to recover money, and we have a responsibility to use the resources entrusted to us efficiently. Based on the experience of our civil lawyers over the past three years, the “all or nothing” approach to cooperation introduced a few years ago was counterproductive in civil cases. "

<SOLUTION: "we are revising the policy to restore some of the discretion that civil attorneys traditionally exercised – with supervisory review."

"If a corporation wants to earn maximum credit, it must identify every individual person who was substantially involved in or responsible for the misconduct. "

FALSE CLAIMS ACT CASES USED AS EXAMPLE (NOTE: THESE CASES ARE FILED SEALED)

>^^^^^^^^[RR] giving us a hint as to what the 61,000+ SEALED DOCUMENTS ARE?

"So our attorneys may reward cooperation that meaningfully assisted the government’s civil investigation, without the need to agree about every employee with potential individual liability. "

Companies caught hiding misconduct by senior leaders or failing to act in good faith will not be eligible for any credit.

"COMMONSENSE REFORMS"

-Department attorneys are permitted to negotiate civil releases for individuals who do not warrant additional investigation in corporate civil settlement agreements, again with appropriate supervisory approval.

-And our attorneys once again are permitted to consider an individual’s ability to pay in deciding whether to pursue a civil judgment.

"These commonsense reforms restore to our attorneys some of the discretion they previously exercised in civil cases; the same discretion routinely exercised by private lawyers and clients and by government agencies responsible for using their resources most efficiently to achieve their enforcement mission. "

^^^^^^^RATS RUNNING?

DOJ POLICIES THAT WERE CHANGED

https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-1-12000-coordination-parallel-criminal-civil-regulatory-and-administrative-proceedings?utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery#1-12.000

https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-4-3000-compromising-and-closing?utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery#4-3.100

https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-9-28000-principles-federal-prosecution-business-organizations?utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery#9-28.210

>>4114815

>How is Huber testifying in a closed session, saying things to people who already know the truth because they either are (((them))) or they are on the team - how is that significant?

Honestly, I think he is testifying in part for the DOJ Semi-Annual Report due to Congress. Huber's investigation/budget has been significant over the past 6+months and he needs to answer Congress but in a CLAS setting because the 61,000+ Court Docs have not been unsealed. In my other post I explain how I think it is a YUGE False Claims Case based on hints RR gave us in his speech this past Thursday. No one can talk publicly about these cases until the case is unsealed by the court.

>>4114902

>It likely will remain classified for some time.

False Claims cases MUST be sealed for minimum 60 days and re-visited to extend that time frame. I think the investigation part is over and now it is just up to the sealing time to run out and the courts to start unsealing the cases. Hell yeah 61,000+ unsealed False Claims Cases is an avalanche!

>>4114928

>So why all the fear porn for this week.

False Claims Act cases can be partially unsealed….meaning the Defendants may very well have received partially redacted court documents for these sealed cases in an effort to settle/get them to rat. Cabal has been connecting the dots and talking to each other and they know that eventually everything will be unsealed.

Q told us…

The game is over when the public knows.

The fight to keep the LIGHTS OFF is all that matters to you.

You will FAIL.

>>4114981

>>4114995

sauce:

http://vaquitamlaw.com/qui-tam-partial-unsealing/

http://vaquitamlaw.com/qui-tam-partial-unsealing-part-ii/

There is NO WAY TO KNOW if they received partially unsealed court docs but…

USE LOGIC

>>4115182

>I cannot understand WHY We do not enforce the Existing Established Immigration Laws

Because the judicial branch is comped