Anonymous ID: 655855 Dec. 2, 2018, 1:08 p.m. No.4117156   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7166

>>4116818

 

Alternate meanings: Benji.

 

Our Dog Benji.

 

Pet name. 100 dollar bill. C-Note. Federal Reserve Bank Note, history of. Currency denoted as pet name.

 

OUR DOG BENJI

= ERGO Join Dub[ya]

 

= BINGO D[o] Jure

 

(GWB-ism?) Opposite of de facto.

 

D[e] jure

 

ADJ: by right; according to law

ADV: by law; conforming to the law

 

The phrase de jure is often used to emphasize the opposite of de facto, which means "by fact, or "by practice." For example, de facto practices at companies are sometimes discriminatory despite de jure regulations against those practices. The Latin phrase literally means "of law," and it's been used since the 1600s to mean "legitimate or legal," especially by those in the legal profession.

 

https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/de%20jure

 

OUR DOG BENJI

= ERGO, GEO[RGE]

 

or

 

= ERGO, GORE

 

Double meaning, gore?

Anonymous ID: 655855 Dec. 2, 2018, 1:32 p.m. No.4117579   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7656

>>4114067 old

 

Goodlatte interviewed on Fox.

 

SGT at Arms can enforce sub issued – immediately enforce – so Comey can be held if he refused to cooperate during questioning.

 

Comey may imagine an out: if the agreement is that the testimony will be transcribed for public release, then, he might put up a tussle over redactions. That is, if this amounts to a public questioning (just a slight delay in making its contents public) then he could return to the rehearsed line that would not discuss certain matters blah-blah-blah.

 

But this questioning will be held behind closed doors because the Committee majority wanted it that way. For what reason? Unexpected turns are expected?

 

Also consider the sequence, as per Q Posts, of the individuals being brought to testify. LL has prolly already opened up her can of worms. Like those before her, she plays her part in setting the stage – expectations can be wildly disparate – for what follows. Many options for the Committee on paths to take as they prepare to hand-off to the Senate Committee(s).

 

Recall how the OIG Report followed and tucked into the contradictions in both public accounting and content specifics with the Peter and Lovely Lisa questionings.

 

Cornered, there is recourse to falling on one's sword but to what end? Whose end? The end of one thing (person) and the beginning of another?

Anonymous ID: 655855 Dec. 2, 2018, 1:36 p.m. No.4117656   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4117579

 

Also:

 

Possible unexpected turn in Comey testimony: He is questioned but is not co-operative (a trap?) and is held in contempt of Congress, immediately held by Sgt at Arms (precedent exists), Congress does this behind closed doors, reports on this publicly, sends message farther afield.

 

Best not done in a public hearing? Advantages and disadvantages, yes.