Just getting on and only skimmed the flurry of Q posts. I came across one that made me want to post here.
Does everyone understand the Fraud Upon The Court?
When a Court has been tricked by false documents, altered documents, false affidavits, and any other form of fraud. Any decision or anything that arose from that decision is null and void AND The Judge MUST recuse himself in the event of further rulings related to any part of that subject. If a judge continues to rule on a matter that later is proven FUTC when it should have been known to the Judge , he /she loses their Judicial immunity and is subject to criminal and civil prosecution. If you want proof that Judges on the FISA knew they were in deep trouble then look at Flynn's original judge! Contreras was his name. He recused from Flynn case the very next day after Comey public haring! Contreras saved his own ass that day but the other 4 Judges didn't. Supreme Court Justice Roberts is also exposed to liability if he didn't/doesn't recuse himself from anything related to the FISA. There is a witness raising issues to head to the SC. The case is under seal. Roberts can't rule and if he does then he is subject to criminal prosecution. This would be historical because no Judge is stupid enough to rule once FUTC is more likely than not to have happened.