>>4134831 (pb)Going forward, do you think the average anon would make more difference to the world in a good way by working for the FBI/SS, or by remaining dedicated to the chan? I guess I am asking if Q Research will remain as important an epicenter to the world, or will it now fade into lesser light?
>>4136290 To troll the MSM, of course.
The "damage" was done. Deleting it doubled the emphasis. Let them guess.
BTW Occam is spelled wrong.
Q's announcement that all of our names are known, for fast-tracking, ought to put a shiver up all the shills' spines! All THEIR names are known too.
Of course, we've been warning them of this outcome for months.