Shills keep saying that the Santa segment on Hannity was mocking Q followers.

But this clearly misses the import of the story. The villain in the story was the know-it-all teacher who claimed Santa wasn't real. Everyone with any sense has disdain for those who tell others that Santa isn't real. Maybe Santa isn't literally real, but better things come from letting kids believe. There is a deeper truth.

Q has said and suggested things that are surely false, but has also admitted that disinfo is necessary, and this may have been necessary to get things going and get people investigating and taking seriously the idea that things are happening that diverge greatly from what the MSM reports.

Is it possible that the Hannity team subbed in the Santa story after the execs killed the original story, as a way of signalling support for those who believe?

The "Scott Free" tweet today was probably the most blatant @realdonaldtrump "Q proof" I've yet seen. I suspect the know-it-alls are going are going to have egg on their faces soon.