Angles on the Hannity "dud"

• Who owns Fox? White or black hat?

• Would Q force a shit-ton of eyes on one program (libtards and normies, too) and purposely make the one guy we're supposed to trust lay a giant egg? Would this be a way to discredit ALL of MSM? (trust none of these idiots)

• Did Q just expose Fox as being lumped in with the other douches?

• Why is Fox starting a web-based, subscription model called Fox Nation? Are they trying to distance themselves from MSM?

• Assuming Hannity is POTUS' golfing pal and real estate protege, would he sweep damning evidence under the rug without pushing back against his bosses?

Use logic only and help me think this through. Thanks in advance.

>>4149807

This ain't bad, Anon. Thanks.

Not arguing, just noodling aloud here…

HW was being galvanized on EVERY OTHER NEWS channel, right? Didn't Fox/Hannity miss an opportunity to completely separate themselves from MSM by paying "opening monologue" lip service to Daddy Bush and then segueing into "we have very serious news to report"?

Thoughts?

>>4149817

Shit.

This has legs.

I really wanted to trust Hannity, because he's been so consistently trying to expose Mueller, Killary and the lot of them.

Also, Q specifically mentioned leaking through Sara Carter and John Solomon (and protecting them), so how do we reconcile that? (pic related)

>>4149870

This is also helpful; thank you, Anon.

Needed to get back up to 40,000' and scan the horizon.