Anonymous ID: 026bf9 Dec. 4, 2018, 12:32 p.m. No.4150818   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1417

>>4150734

I appreciate the creativity extremes that flat earthers go to to justify their complete confirmation bias, but they could see the physics in action with their own naked eyes of what causes the earth to be

round if they would only pay attention.

Anonymous ID: 026bf9 Dec. 4, 2018, 12:43 p.m. No.4150983   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4150956

Cool, that doesn't explain why you are here trying to annoy us. POTUS will sucked or fail with or without us in your train of thought then. your supported of him is in no way related to us. SO again, why are you here?

Anonymous ID: 026bf9 Dec. 4, 2018, 12:53 p.m. No.4151133   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1186

>>4151060

The logic is the statement I made about tucker, and hannity leaving to create their own network is very real and likely eventually. If Hannity took his huge radio audience to the internet he could easily be as big or bigger than blaze pretty quickly and wouldn't need fox or any other network. The wirting is on the wall for old media. They're going to be replaced, Hannity is smart enough and good enough at business to see that.

Anonymous ID: 026bf9 Dec. 4, 2018, 1:01 p.m. No.4151257   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1292 >>1385

>>4151186

Yes, but the speculation is reasonable and timely based on the post by Q saying Fox dropped 3 guests, which also means that Fox went against Hannity if he wanted the guests to begin with. Which means Hannity may decide to leave on his own.

 

Most of what we talk about on this board is reasonable speculation with some direct and indirect evidence to support it. Stop trying to stifle conversation.

Anonymous ID: 026bf9 Dec. 4, 2018, 1:05 p.m. No.4151304   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1343

>>4151226

Great, I add to the research as well, but the extreme advantage this board possesses over other types of intelligence gathering resources is when we collaborate on topics each bringing their own ideas. Who says you get to decide which topics are valid and which aren't? Why would you want that type of power?

Anonymous ID: 026bf9 Dec. 4, 2018, 1:15 p.m. No.4151425   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4151292

>>4151385

I never once mentioned Fusca.. other then to say he was irrelevant to the discussion I was having.

 

Maybe Hannity doesn't care, but he seems to be important to Q, wasn't he one of the ones along with Sara Carter that and Solomon that were protected.